The applicant alleged that his lawyer had not been allowed access to him while the authorities had been conducting an examination of his office. In the course of the examination,
CASE OF SHKIRYA v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 30850/11
The present case concerns the alleged failure of the national courts to determine the applicant’s additional claim, depriving him of his right of access to a court. The applicant invoked Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1…
CASE OF VASILYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) Applications nos. 51329/08 and 17 others – see appended list
THIRD SECTION CASE OF VASILYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (Applications nos. 51329/08 and 17 others – see appended list) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 24 June 2021
CASE OF TANASIYCHUK AND DEREVYANYY v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) Applications nos. 25083/20 and 45967/20
FIFTH SECTION CASE OF TANASIYCHUK AND DEREVYANYY v. UKRAINE (Applications nos. 25083/20 and 45967/20) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 24 June 2021
CASE OF PALANCHUK v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) Applications nos. 46948/19 and 62388/19
FIFTH SECTION CASE OF PALANCHUK v. UKRAINE (Applications nos. 46948/19 and 62388/19) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 24 June 2021 This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Palanchuk v. Ukraine, The European Court of…
CASE OF LASHCH v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) Applications nos. 44160/19 and 57596/19
FIFTH SECTION CASE OF LASHCH v. UKRAINE (Applications nos. 44160/19 and 57596/19) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 24 June 2021
CASE OF DODOJA v. CROATIA (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 53587/17
The case concerns the applicant’s complaint that he was sentenced to a higher penalty on account of a police statement of his co-accused, who had meanwhile absconded and was being tried in absentia.
CASE OF HASALIKOVA v. SLOVAKIA (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 39654/15
The applicant complained that the criminal proceedings, in which she had been convicted of murder and sentenced to a fifteen-year prison term, had been unfair.
CASE OF IMERI v. CROATIA (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 77668/14
The case concerns confiscation of a sum of foreign currency which the applicant, a Norwegian national, did not declare when crossing the Croatian-Slovenian border.
CASE OF KHACHATUROV v. ARMENIA (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 59687/17
The application, lodged under Articles 2 and 3 of the Convention, concerns the applicant’s allegation that his transfer, if the decision to extradite him to Russia were implemented, would expose him to risks to his life and physical well-being, considering…