The applications concern the operation carried out in the village of Borozdinovskaya by the Vostok Battalion in Chechnya on 4 June 2005. The applicants alleged that military service personnel unlawfully searched their houses,
CASE OF S.W. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 87/18
The applicant complains that accusations of professional misconduct made by a Family Court judge in the course of a fact-finding hearing in which she gave evidence as a professional witness breached her rights under Articles 6 and 8 of the…
CASE OF BOYKO AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) Applications nos. 24753/13 and 3 others – see appended table
The applicants alleged that they had been ill-treated by the police and that the investigation into their respective complaints had been ineffective. In addition, one applicant (application no. 57854/13) also raised other complaints under Article
CASE OF TRYAPYSHKO v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 59577/12
The present case concerns the applicant’s complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention that the appellate court had acted arbitrarily when it accepted the respondent’s
CASE OF SHUBITIDZE v. GEORGIA (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 43854/12
The case concerns the alleged unfairness, within the meaning of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, of the criminal proceedings conducted against the applicant, on account of the manner in which the principal evidence was obtained and used against…
CASE OF MATTEI AND OTHERS v. MALTA (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 14615/19
The case concerns the requisition of the applicants’ property and the disproportionality of the rent received by the applicants under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1, as well as the effectiveness of the Constitutional Court as a remedy for the…
CASE OF SANDOR VARGA AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY (European Court of Human Rights) Applications nos. 39734/15 and 2 others
The cases concern the applicants’ life imprisonment without the possibility of release on parole. The applicants complained that their sentences constituted inhuman and degrading punishment, in breach of Article 3 of the Convention.
CASE OF KURT v. AUSTRIA (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 62903/15
The applicant alleged, in particular, that the Austrian authorities had failed to protect her and her children from her violent husband, and that this had resulted in him murdering their son.
Melike v. Turkey – 35786/19 (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 252 June 2021 Melike v. Turkey – 35786/19 Judgment 15.6.2021 [Section II]
Vardan Martirosyan v. Armenia (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 252 June 2021 Vardan Martirosyan v. Armenia – 13610/12 Judgment 15.6.2021 [Section IV]