Information Note on the Court’s case-law 247 January 2021 Lacatus v. Switzerland – 14065/15 Judgment 19.1.2021 [Section III]
CASE OF VELESCO v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 53918/11
. The present case concerns the alleged lack of an effective investigation into the death of the applicant’s son.
CASE OF LIMA S.R.L. v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 46256/10
. The case concerns the failure of the State to enforce a final judgment in favour of the applicant company within a reasonable time.
CASE OF MURADU v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 26947/09
. The present case concerns the applicant’s alleged ill-treatment during police detention and the insufficiency of its investigation, as well as the reasons for the applicant’s detention
CASE OF KURKIN v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 51098/07
. The present application raises issues of the applicant’s alleged ill‑treatment and unrecorded detention at the police station, of the lack of an effective investigation into his ill-treatment complaint
CASE OF TASHUYEV v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 12981/15
. The case concerns the Russian authorities’ refusal to return the body of the applicant’s deceased son, who had allegedly participated in terrorist attacks in the Republic of Kabardino-Balkariya
CASE OF PIETRIS S.A. AND NASTAS v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 45379/13
. The case concerns the refusal of the domestic courts to examine the applicants’ case due to failure to pay court taxes.
CASE OF KRAMARENKO AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) Applications nos. 21840/13 and 22271/13
. The applications concern alleged unrecorded detention and ill‑treatment of the applicants, relatives of a suspect in a criminal case, at police station no. 6 in Voronezh in October 2011.
CASE OF OKUYUCU v. TURKEY (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 62657/12
Introduction. The case concerns the applicant’s inability to be present before the appeal court examining his objection and the non-communication of the public prosecutor’s written opinion,
CASE OF PUISYS v. LITHUANIA (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 58166/18
. The application concerns construction of a house which was carried out after obtaining the relevant permits but later declared to be partly unlawful.