. The present case concerns the applicant’s right of access to a court in the framework of foreclosure proceedings, in which the summons had not been personally served on him and his wife.
CASE OF AKTIVA DOO v. SERBIA (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 23079/11
. The application concerns the seizure and sale of goods owned by the applicant company which were imported legally but were allegedly traded in contravention of the regulations on recording trade in goods
CASE OF SHLYKOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) Applications nos. 78638/11 and 3 others– see appended list
. The cases concern the routine handcuffing of life prisoners, lack of remedy to complain about routine handcuffing, prison regime and the authorities’ failure to allow some of the applicants
CASE OF KESKIN v. THE NETHERLANDS (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 2205/16
. The case concerns the inability of the applicant to cross-examine seven witnesses whose statements were used in evidence in criminal proceedings against him,
Shmorgunov and Others v. Ukraine (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 247 January 2021 Shmorgunov and Others v. Ukraine – 9078/14, 15367/14, 16280/14 et al. Judgment 21.1.2021 [Section V]
Lutsenko and Verbytskyy v. Ukraine (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 247 January 2021 Lutsenko and Verbytskyy v. Ukraine – 12482/14 and 39800/14 Judgment 21.1.2021 [Section V]
Georgia v. Russia (II) [GC] (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 247 January 2021 Georgia v. Russia (II) [GC] – 38263/08 Judgment 21.1.2021 [GC]
CASE OF PIROS v. HUNGARY (European Court of Human Rights)
FIRST SECTION CASE OF PIROS v. HUNGARY (Application no. 37149/18) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 21 January 2021
CASE OF ESTRINA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights)
THIRD SECTION CASE OF ESTRINA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (Applications nos. 32944/14 and 6 others – see appended list) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 21 January 2021
CASE OF LESHCHENKO v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) Applications nos. 14220/13 and 72601/13
. The applicant, a journalist, alleged, under Article 10 of the Convention, that his right to receive and impart information had been violated as he had been refused access to information and documentation