The applicants complained of the disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers and participants of public assemblies. FIRST SECTION CASE OF KUDRYASHOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (Applications nos. 2606/12 and 29 others – see appended list) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 23 March…
CASE OF PIRTSKHALAVA AND TSAADZE v. GEORGIA – The present case concerns the applicants’ complaint that they were not given a fair trial, because of the domestic courts’ reliance on what the applicants considered to be unreliable witness evidence.
The present case concerns the applicants’ complaint that they were not given a fair trial, as required by Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, because of the domestic courts’ reliance on what the applicants considered to be unreliable witness evidence.…
CASE OF UDOVYCHENKO v. UKRAINE – 46396/14. The case concerns the applicant’s civil liability, for a factual statement which she had been unable to prove.
The case concerns the applicant’s civil liability, allegedly in breach of Article 10 of the Convention, for a factual statement which she had been unable to prove. FIFTH SECTION CASE OF UDOVYCHENKO v. UKRAINE (Application no. 46396/14) JUDGMENT Art 10…
CASE OF ROGALSKI v. POLAND – 5420/16
The case concerns disciplinary proceedings against the applicant, who was fined for unethical conduct for notifying a commission of a criminal offence by a prosecutor without a proper basis in fact, moderation, proportionality and caution. FIRST SECTION CASE OF ROGALSKI…
Deltuva v. Lithuania
Legal summary March 2023 Deltuva v. Lithuania – 38144/20 Judgment 21.3.2023 [Section II] Article 8 Article 8-1 Respect for family life Restriction of remand prisoner’s family visits with wife and ten-year-old daughter during first nine months of detention based on…
Telek v. Türkiye
Legal summary March 2023 Telek v. Türkiye – 66763/17, 66767/17 and 15891/18 Judgment 21.3.2023 [Section II] Article 8 Article 8-1 Respect for private life Academics’ work and personal lives abroad significantly impacted by unlawful and potentially arbitrary cancellation of passports…
CASE OF KOP v. TÜRKİYE – 47404/20
The present application concerns the seizure by the prison administration of the applicant’s manuscript of short stories when he handed it over to be sent to his mother by post. SECOND SECTION CASE OF KOP v. TÜRKİYE (Application no. 47404/20)…
CASE OF USLU v. TÜRKİYE – 51590/19
The application concerns the seizure of the applicant’s (paper) notebooks by the prison administration on the grounds that some prisoners suspected of the offence of membership of an organisation referred to by the Turkish authorities as “FETÖ/PDY” (“Fetullahist Terror Organisation/Parallel…
CASE OF RADIKA PREVOZI DOO LJUBLJANA v. NORTH MACEDONIA – 52003/18
The application concerns the applicant company’s complaint under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention that the temporary seizure of its vehicle and the subsequent compensation proceedings resulted in damage which remained uncompensated. SECOND SECTION CASE OF RADIKA…
CASE OF BRĂDEAN AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA – 21680/18
The case concerns the applicants’ complaint about the alleged breach of their right of access to a court guaranteed by Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, after the domestic courts declared their tort action inadmissible as having been lodged…