FIRST SECTION CASE OF HORVATOVICH v. HUNGARY (Application no. 12141/16) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 9 March 2023
CASE OF AZALIYA, TOV AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE – 31211/14 and 31338/14
FIFTH SECTION CASE OF AZALIYA, TOV AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (Applications nos. 31211/14 and 31338/14) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 9 March 2023
CASE OF BUDAYEVA v. UKRAINE – 75485/12
FIFTH SECTION CASE OF BUDAYEVA v. UKRAINE (Application no. 75485/12) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 9 March 2023 This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.
CASE OF APRILE v. ITALY – 11557/09
The case concerns the applicant’s complaint that she was deprived of land through the application of an indirect form of expropriation (“occupazione usurpativa”) by the domestic courts.
CASE OF CUPIAL v. POLAND – 67414/11
The case mainly concerns the applicant’s complaint about the breach of his right to a fair trial on account of his criminal conviction for the psychological abuse of his children by means of subjecting them to allegedly excessive religious practices.
Kogan and Others v. Russia
Legal summary March 2023 Kogan and Others v. Russia – 54003/20 Judgment 7.3.2023 [Section III] Article 18 Restrictions for unauthorised purposes Revocation of prominent human rights lawyer’s residence permit predominantly aiming to punish her and her husband for human rights…
Ossewaarde v. Russia
Legal summary March 2023 Ossewaarde v. Russia – 27227/17 Judgment 7.3.2023 [Section III] Article 9 Article 9-1 Freedom of religion
CASE OF GRIMA AND OTHERS v. MALTA – 18052/20
The applicants complained under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention alone and in conjunction with Article 13 that they remained victims of the violation upheld
CASE OF BABIC v. CROATIA – 45391/16
The case concerns the applicant’s alleged ill-treatment by the police during his arrest and his subsequent convictions in both minor-offence and criminal proceedings.
CASE OF KARATAY v. TÜRKİYE – 28377/11
The application mainly concerns, under Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (c) of the Convention, the systemic restriction imposed on the applicant’s right of access to a lawyer