The main issues in the present case are whether the revocation of the first applicant’s residence permit in Russia interfered with her and her relatives’ right to respect for their private
CASE OF OSSEWAARDE v. RUSSIA – 27227/17
The case concerns an administrative sanction imposed on the applicant, a Baptist Christian, for holding Bible meetings in his home without notifying the authorities.
CASE OF MAMASAKHLISI v. GEORGIA AND RUSSIA – 29999/04 and 41424/04
The applications concern the following complaints by the first and third applicants: their alleged ill-treatment during their questioning in Abkhazia, the allegedly inadequate conditions of their subsequent detention
CASE OF KHRUS AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE – 38328/14 and 4 others
The applicants complained, in particular, under Article 3 of the Convention, that they had been subjected to ill-treatment by law-enforcement authorities
CASE OF KLYMENKO v. UKRAINE – 14301/14
The case concerns the allegedly unlawful and unnecessary eviction of the applicants from a State-owned hostel.
CASE OF TRACHUK v. UKRAINE – 24413/13
The case concerns allegations, under Article 3 and Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, that the applicant was ill-treated by officers of the Kramatorsk police,
CASE OF MUKHTARLI AND ASLANLI v. AZERBAIJAN – 13509/12 and 64801/12
The applications concern the administrative arrest, detention, and subsequent conviction of the applicants, prior to a demonstration, on charges of minor hooliganism.
CASE OF BTS HOLDING, A.S. v. SLOVAKIA – 55617/17
FIRST SECTION CASE OF BTS HOLDING, A.S. v. SLOVAKIA (Application no. 55617/17) JUDGMENT (Just satisfaction – striking out) Art 41 • Just satisfaction • Art 39 • Friendly settlement STRASBOURG 2 March 2023
CASE OF DZERKORASHVILI AND OTHERS v. GEORGIA – 70572/16
The present case principally concerns the applicants’ complaint under Article 5 of the Convention relating to their alleged unlawful detention for approximately twelve hours.
CASE OF CROATIAN RADIO-TELEVISION v. CROATIA – 52132/19 and 19 others
The case concerns divergent decisions of domestic courts in twenty sets of civil proceedings regarding unjust enrichment which the applicant