The applications concern two separate sets of proceedings resulting in two criminal convictions of the same applicant, a journalist who wrote under the pen name “Sardar Alibeyli”,
CASE OF COMPOSTELLA AND SALAMONE v. ITALY (European Court of Human Rights) 46306/06 and 24940/07
The case concerns the expropriation of the applicants’ land and the subsequent award of compensation based on the criteria established by section 5 bis of Law no. 359 of 8 August 1992 (“Law 359/1992”).
CASE OF ALHOWAIS v. HUNGARY (European Court of Human Rights) 59435/17
The case concerns the death of F., a Syrian migrant and the applicant’s brother, which occurred during a border control operation at a river on the Hungarian-Serbian border.
CASE OF JANACEK v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC (European Court of Human Rights) 9634/17
The present case concerns the failure of the Constitutional Court to communicate to the applicant the written observations of the general courts involved in his case,
CASE OF AKSHIN GARAYEV v. AZERBAIJAN (European Court of Human Rights) 30352/11
The application, lodged under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention and Article 13 of the Convention, concerns the continuing and lengthy retention, as physical evidence in criminal proceedings,
CASE OF SINITSYN AND ALEKHIN v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 39879/12
The present case concerns a ban on the publications of the Falun Gong (Falun Dafa) a Chinese spiritual movement whose practice combines meditation and exercises with a moral philosophy.
CASE OF NABOKIKH AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 19428/11 and 6 others
The cases concern the disruption of Jehovah’s Witnesses religious meetings.
CASE OF RESTANTIA v. ROMANIA (European Court of Human Rights) 10875/19
The application concerns the applicant’s extended medical detention in a psychiatric hospital (since 2011) and the consequences this measure had for the conduct of civil proceedings concerning the property title to his family house.
CASE OF ESANU v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA (European Court of Human Rights) 15230/18
The present case concerns the applicant’s deprivation of liberty pending trial on several charges for a total of twenty-two months in the absence of relevant and sufficient reasons,
CASE OF STEFANOVA v. BULGARIA (European Court of Human Rights) 39232/17
The case concerns a complaint under Article 5 § 5 of the Convention that, when the applicant sought compensation for having been unlawfully detained by the police,