FOURTH SECTION CASE OF S.C. ECOREC S.A. AND DOMBROVSCHI v. ROMANIA (Application no. 31237/14) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 24 January 2023
CASE OF KUTAYEV v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 17912/15
The case concerns the alleged arrest, unlawful detention and ill‑treatment of a well-known Chechen human rights activist in connection with a drug-related offence, and his subsequent conviction
CASE OF SVETOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 54714/17
The case concerns complaints about an unjustified search in the home of the applicants and the indiscriminate seizure of their personal belongings under Article 8 of the Convention.
Macate v. Lithuania [GC] (European Court of Human Rights)
Legal summary January 2023 Macatė v. Lithuania [GC] – 61435/19 Judgment 23.1.2023 [GC] Article 10 Article 10-1 Freedom of expression Freedom to impart information
CASE OF MACATE v. LITHUANIA (European Court of Human Rights) 61435/19
The case concerns a collection of six fairy tales written by the applicant, two of which depicted marriage between persons of the same sex. After its publication, the distribution of the book was temporarily suspended,
CASE OF VALAITIS v. LITHUANIA (European Court of Human Rights) 976/20
The case concerns the applicants’ complaint that the first applicant had been dismissed from his job at the company AB Amber Grid because of his role in the activities of the second applicant
CASE OF DARAIBOU v. CROATIA (European Court of Human Rights) 84523/17
The present case concerns a fire that broke out in a detention centre, in which three detained migrants died and the applicant suffered severe injuries. The applicant complained, under both the substantive
CASE OF FEDOTOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 40792/10, 30538/14 and 43439/14
The applicants alleged that they were unable to have their respective relationships recognised and protected by law, on account of the Russian authorities’ refusal to allow them to marry
CASE OF BERTAGNA v. ITALY (European Court of Human Rights) 20308/03
The applicant complained of the excessive length of civil proceedings.
CASE OF POTOCZKA AND ADAMCO v. SLOVAKIA (European Court of Human Rights) 7286/16
The case concerns the tapping in 2004, in the course of criminal proceedings concerning the second applicant, of a mobile telephone line for which the subscription was in the name of the first applicant but which