The applicants complained of the inadequate conditions of detention during their transport. Some applicants also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
The applicant complained of the delayed enforcement of domestic decisions. He also raised other complaints under the Convention.
The applicant complained that he had been unfairly convicted of drug offences following entrapment by State agents. He also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
The application concerns an alleged violation of the applicant’s right to respect for her private life under Article 8 of the Convention in that a blood test for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)
The case principally concerns the alleged restriction of the applicants’ access to a court under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention following a decision of the Constitutional Court interpreting the competence
The case concerns defamation proceedings against the applicant following the publication of an article he had written on alleged judicial corruption and an injunction ordering to take down
The case concerns the adequacy of the applicant’s medical treatment in detention and his placement in a metal cage during court hearings, allegedly in breach of Article 3 of the Convention,
The present case concerns the applicant’s complaints about his confinement in the “enhanced (intensive) supervision unit” of the Kyiv Psychoneurological Residential Institution in the period between
The application concerns alleged violations of Articles 3, 5 and 13 of the Convention on account of the applicants’ treatment by the Ukrainian authorities while in the transit zone of an international airport
The present application concerns alleged reprisals against the applicant and the manner in which he was treated by the prison authorities after the delivery of the Court’s judgment in respect