The applicants complained of the inadequate conditions of their detention and of the lack of any effective remedy in domestic law.
CASE OF DAMBE AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) Applications nos. 27117/20 and 4 others
The applicants complained of the excessive length of criminal proceedings and of the lack of any effective remedy in domestic law.
CASE OF PARKHOMENKO v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 451/13
The applicant alleged that she did not receive adequate medical care in detention.
CASE OF PAVEL AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 11950/16 and 10 others
FOURTH SECTION CASE OF PAVEL AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA (Application no. 11950/16 and 10 others) JUDGMENT (Revision) STRASBOURG 28 October 2021
CASE OF RADU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 50868/16 and 5 others
The applicants complained of the inadequate conditions of their detention.
CASE OF DRĂGAN AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 9816/16 and 5 others
The applicants complained under Article 3 of the Convention of the inadequate conditions of their detention.
CASE OF NEGHINĂ AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 37620/15 and 10 others
FOURTH SECTION CASE OF NEGHINĂ AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA (Application no. 37620/15 and 10 others) JUDGMENT (Revision) STRASBOURG 28 October 2021
CASE OF RODZEVILLO AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 27870/18 and 2 others
The applicants complained of the life sentence with no prospect of release.
CASE OF YELOVSKIY AND CHAKRYAN v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) Applications nos. 3336/16 and 20490/20
The applicants complained of the permanent video surveillance of detainees in pre-trial or post-conviction detention facilities.
CASE OF ALEKSEYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) Applications nos. 42856/16 and 8 others
The applicants complained of the permanent video surveillance of detainees in pre-trial or post-conviction detention facilities. Some applicants also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.