The applicant complained of the excessive length of his pre-trial detention. He also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
CASE OF ZVEREV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 26363/18 and 2 others
The applicants complained of the permanent video surveillance of detainees in post-conviction detention facilities and the lack of an effective remedy in that respect.
CASE OF STEPANISHCHEV v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 22911/18. The applicant complained of the permanent video surveillance of detainees in a post-conviction detention facility
The case originated in an application against Russia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on 3 May 2018.
CASE OF VELCU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA (European Court of Human Rights) 63313/16 and 11 others
The applicants complained of the inadequate conditions of their detention. FOURTH SECTION CASE OF VELCU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA
CASE OF MATA v. HUNGARY – 7329/16. The application concerns the applicant’s alleged ill-treatment by the police and the potentially racist motives behind the incident, given the applicant’s Roma origin
It raises issues of Articles 3 and 14 of the Convention. FIRST SECTION CASE OF MATA v. HUNGARY (Application no. 7329/16) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 7 July 2022
CASE OF VISLOBOKOV AND GORDON v. RUSSIA 31578/10 and 6059/11. The applicants complained of the secret surveillance in the context of criminal proceedings
The case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”).
CASE OF YERUSLANOV v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 69591/17
The applicant alleged that he did not receive adequate medical care in detention and that there was no effective remedy in that regard. He also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
CASE OF CHERNOUSOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 79688/16 and 2 others
The applicants alleged that they did not receive adequate medical care in detention and that there was no effective remedy in that regard. In application no. 73786/17, the applicant also raised other complaints under the Convention.
CASE OF HUBER v. CROATIA (European Court of Human Rights) 39571/16
The case originated in an application against Croatia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on 4 July 2016.
CASE OF CHOCHOLÁČ v. SLOVAKIA (European Court of Human Rights) 81292/17
The case concerns a rule pursuant to which inmates serving prison sentences are banned from possessing adult material because it is considered to be a threat to morality. It mainly raises issues under Article 8 of the Convention.