The applicants complained of the disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies. European Court of Human Rights FIRST SECTION CASE OF YAKHNOVETS AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (Applications nos. 32174/21 and 27 others – see appended…
CASE OF BIREV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA – 28538/21 and 21 others
The applicants complained of the disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies. European Court of Human Rights FIRST SECTION CASE OF BIREV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (Applications nos. 28538/21 and 21 others – see appended…
CASE OF URSEI v. ROMANIA – 9233/21
European Court of Human Rights FOURTH SECTION CASE OF URSEI v. ROMANIA (Application no. 9233/21) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 18 January 2024 This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Ursei v. Romania, The…
CASE OF RADCHENKO AND ABRAMOV v. UKRAINE – The applicants alleged that they did not receive adequate medical care in detention
European Court of Human Rights (Application no. 5312/20 and 22627/20) The applicants complained principally that they were not afforded adequate medical treatment in detention. They relied on Article 3 of the Convention. The Court notes that the applicants suffered from…
CASE OF RADCHENKO AND ABRAMOV v. UKRAINE – 5312/20 and 22627/20
The applicants alleged that they did not receive adequate medical care in detention. European Court of Human Rights FIFTH SECTION CASE OF RADCHENKO AND ABRAMOV v. UKRAINE (Applications nos. 5312/20 and 22627/20) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 18 January 2024 This judgment is…
CASE OF KENTESH AND BORODYNYA v. UKRAINE – 44244/19 and 26300/22
The applicants complained of the ineffective investigation into the deaths of their relatives, which had not resulted from involvement of State agents. European Court of Human Rights FIFTH SECTION CASE OF KENTESH AND BORODYNYA v. UKRAINE (Applications nos. 44244/19 and…
CASE OF K.P. v. HUNGARY – The case concerned the applicant’s removal from Hungary to Serbia
European Court of Human Rights (Application no. 82479/17) On 1 June 2017 the applicant entered Hungary from Romania irregularly. He then entered, likewise irregularly, Austria on 3 June 2017. On the same day he was handed over from the Austrian…
CASE OF K.P. v. HUNGARY – 82479/17
European Court of Human Rights FIFTH SECTION CASE OF K.P. v. HUNGARY (Application no. 82479/17) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 18 January 2024 This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of K.P. v. Hungary, The…
CASE OF AGOSTINHO RIBEIRO v. PORTUGAL – 74693/17 and 17194/19
Relying on Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, the applicants complained of the excessive length of criminal proceedings brought against them by the public prosecutor at the Matosinhos Criminal Court. European Court of Human Rights FOURTH SECTION CASE OF…
CASE OF YEDIGARYAN v. ARMENIA – 56126/17
European Court of Human Rights FOURTH SECTION CASE OF YEDIGARYAN v. ARMENIA (Application no. 56126/17) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 18 January 2024 This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Yedigaryan v. Armenia, The…