Information Note on the Court’s case-law November 2022 Hovhannisyan and Nazaryan v. Armenia – 2169/12 and 29887/14 Judgment 8.11.2022 [Section IV] Article 2 Positive obligations Article 2-1 Life Effective investigation
CASE OF SAVITSKIY v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 35839/13
THIRD SECTION CASE OF SAVITSKIY v. RUSSIA (Application no. 35839/13) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 8 November 2022 This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.
CASE OF HOVHANNISYAN AND NAZARYAN v. ARMENIA (European Court of Human Rights) 2169/12 and 29887/14
The case concerns the death of A. Nazaryan, the first applicant’s son and the second applicant’s brother during his military service, allegedly by suicide, and the subsequent investigation.
CASE OF VARDANYAN AND KHALAFYAN v. ARMENIA (European Court of Human Rights) 2265/12
The case concerns the death of Mr Vahan Khalafyan in police custody aged 24 and raises issues mainly under Articles 2 and 3 of the Convention.
CASE OF NIKOLAY KOSTADINOV v. BULGARIA (European Court of Human Rights) 21743/15
The case concerns the adequacy of the domestic authorities’ reaction to a criminal encroachment upon the applicant’s “possessions”, namely a third party fraudulently taking control of the applicant’s company
CASE OF MORARU v. ROMANIA (European Court of Human Rights) 64480/19
The application concerns the authorities’ refusal to allow the applicant to sit the entrance examination to study military medicine because her height and weight were below the thresholds set by an Order of the Ministry of National Defence
CASE OF GAGGL v. AUSTRIA (European Court of Human Rights) 63950/19
The present case concerns the applicant’s complaints under Articles 5 and 6 of the Convention that the criminal trial against her and her conviction for the attempted murder of her husband was unfair and the detention resulting from
CASE OF MARINA AUCANADA GROUP S.L. v. SPAIN (European Court of Human Rights) 7567/19
The application concerns the applicant company’s complaint that it was not directly served with a summons in the context of judicial administrative proceedings concerning the annulment of a decision announcing a public call for tenders.
CASE OF VERES v. SPAIN (European Court of Human Rights) 57906/18
The present case mainly concerns an alleged violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his family life under Article 8 of the Convention as a result of the excessive length of the recognition and enforcement proceedingsin Spain
CASE OF AYUSO TORRES v. SPAIN (European Court of Human Rights) 74729/17
The applicant complained under Article 6 § 1 and Article 10 of the Convention that, while no sanction had been imposed on him in a set of disciplinary proceedings, it had been stated in the decision adopted in those proceedings…