The applicant alleged that his extradition to the United States of America (“US”) would violate Article 3 of the Convention because, if convicted of the charges against him, he would be at risk of receiving a sentence of life imprisonment…
CASE OF BAHTIĆ v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA (European Court of Human Rights) 4034/22
The applicant complained of the non-enforcement of a domestic decision issued in her favour against the City of Zenica. FOURTH SECTION CASE OF BAHTIĆ v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA (Application no. 4034/22) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 27 October 2022 This judgment is final…
CASE OF PRYKHODKO AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 32479/21 and 6 others
The applicants complained of the inadequate conditions of their detention and of the lack of any effective remedy in domestic law. FIFTH SECTION CASE OF PRYKHODKO AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (Applications nos. 32479/21 and 6 others – see appended list)…
CASE OF PYZH AND DOBROVOLSKIY v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights)
The applicants complained of the deficiencies in proceedings for review of the lawfulness of detention. THIRD SECTION CASE OF PYZH AND DOBROVOLSKIY v. RUSSIA (Applications nos. 20285/21 and 28054/21 – see appended list) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 27 October 2022 This judgment…
CASE OF VDOVIN v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 1387/21
The applicant complained of the inadequate conditions of his detention, which were incompatible with his disabilities, and of the absence of an effective remedy in that regard. THIRD SECTION CASE OF VDOVIN v. RUSSIA (Application no. 1387/21) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 27…
CASE OF PANKRATOV AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 45358/20 and 8 others
The applicants complained of the excessive length of criminal proceedings and of the lack of any effective remedy in domestic law. FIFTH SECTION CASE OF PANKRATOV AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (Application no. 45358/20 and 8 others – see appended list)…
CASE OF BAYSHEV v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 41223/20
The applicant complained of the deficiencies in proceedings for review of the lawfulness of detention and about the lengthy detention on remand THIRD SECTION CASE OF BAYSHEV v. RUSSIA (Application no. 41223/20) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 27 October 2022 This judgment is…
CASE OF FEDAS AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 40045/20 and 3 others
The applicants complained of the deficiencies in proceedings for review of the lawfulness of detention under Article 5 § 4 of the Convention. THIRD SECTION CASE OF FEDAS AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (Applications nos. 40045/20 and 3 others – see…
CASE OF KARALOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 26314/20 and 4 others
The applicantscomplained that they had been unfairly convicted of drug offences following entrapment by State agents. THIRD SECTION CASE OF KARALOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (Applications nos. 26314/20 and 4 others – see appended list) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 27 October 2022…
CASE OF LATYUK AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 23548/20 and 6 others
The applicants complained of the excessive length of civil proceedings and of the lack of any effective remedy in domestic law. FIFTH SECTION CASE OF LATYUK AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (Applications nos. 23548/20 and 6 others – see appended list)…