The applicant complained that he had been unfairly convicted of drug offences following entrapment by State agents.
CASE OF I.T. AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 18693/14 and 3 others
The applicants complained of the inadequate conditions of detention under strict imprisonment regime.
CASE OF TRETYAKOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 51127/13 and 3 others
The applicants complained of secret surveillance in the context of criminal proceedings against them.
CASE OF PETLIN AND YAKUPOV v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 14829/12 and 20420/12
The case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”).
Xenofontos and Others v. Cyprus – The case mainly concerns the question whether a criminal trial can be considered to be “fair” within the meaning of Article 6 of the Convention if it led to a conviction based to a decisive extent on accomplice testimony
Information Note on the Court’s case-law October 2022 Xenofontos and Others v. Cyprus – 68725/16, 74339/16 and 74359/16 Judgment 25.10.2022 [Section III] Article 6 Criminal proceedings Article 6-1 Fair hearing
CASE OF XENOFONTOS AND OTHERS v. CYPRUS (European Court of Human Rights) 68725/16, 74339/16 and 74359/16
The case mainly concerns the question whether a criminal trial can be considered to be “fair” within the meaning of Article 6 of the Convention if it led to a conviction based to a decisive extent on accomplice testimony.
M.T. and Others v. Sweden (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law October 2022 M.T. and Others v. Sweden – 22105/18 Judgment 20.10.2022 [Section I] Article 8 Positive obligations Article 8-1 Respect for family life
Bierski v. Poland (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law October 2022 Bierski v. Poland – 46342/19 Judgment 20.10.2022 [Section I] Article 8 Positive obligations Article 8-1 Respect for family life
CASE OF MUSHYNSKYY v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 27182/16
The case concerns the applicant’s complaint under Article 3 of the Convention that he was ill-treated during an emergency fire evacuation in Sokal Prison no. 47 on 27 March 2012
CASE OF TUČS v. LATVIA (European Court of Human Rights) 31876/15
The case concerns a complaint that in domestic proceedings concerning the applicant’s dismissal from his job the domestic courts had failed to address his claim that he had been discriminated against