The applicant complained of the restrictions on family visits in pre-trial detention facilities. He also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
CASE OF GOVOROV v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 79809/17
The applicant complained about the restrictions on family visits in pre‑trial detention facilities.
CASE OF RUSSJAN v. POLAND (European Court of Human Rights) 79509/17
The applicant complained of the excessive length of his pre-trial detention.
CASE OF SURZHAN AND GULYY v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 74633/17 and 13754/18
The applicants complained of the lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention.
CASE OF ALEKSANDR BIKBULATOV v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 72792/17
The applicant complained of the restrictions on family visits in pre-trial detention facilities. He also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
CASE OF FEDONIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 30296/17 and 2 others
The applicants complained of the secret surveillance in the context of criminal proceedings. Some applicants also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
CASE OF PITKEVICH AND SAUSHINA v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 20296/17
The applicants complained of the secret surveillance in the context of criminal proceedings and the lack of an effective remedy in that respect.
CASE OF SYAZIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 68334/16 and 2 others
The applicants complained of the secret surveillance in the context of criminal proceedings.
CASE OF VOLOKHOV v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 50701/16
The applicant complained of the inadequate conditions of his detention under strict imprisonment regime.
CASE OF VITAN v. ROMANIA (European Court of Human Rights) 31956/16 and 9 others
The applicants complained of the inadequate conditions of their detention.