The applicants complained about theirconfinement in a metal cage in the courtroom during the criminal proceedings against them.
CASE OF ROMANENKO AND SMIRNOV v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 81595/17 and 4512/20
The applicants alleged that they did not receive adequate medical care in detention and that there was no effective remedy in that regard.
CASE OF STOLBOVSKIKH v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 77444/17 and 17048/20
Mr Vladimir Stolbovskikh (hereinafter – the first applicant) complained of the inadequate conditions of detention during his transport. The applicants also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
CASE OF KHUREN-OOL AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 77300/17 and 5 others
The applicants complained of the permanent video surveillance of detainees in pre-trial or post-conviction detention facilities. They also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
CASE OF KARIMOV v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 76451/17
The applicant complained of the excessive length of his pre-trial detention. He also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
CASE OF ARDABYEVSKIY AND FARADZHEVA v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 73364/17 and 49116/20
The applicants complained of the excessive length of their pre-trial detention.In application no. 49116/20 the applicant also raised a complaint under Article 3 of the Convention.
CASE OF VINOKUROV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 72535/17 and 43 others
The applicants complainedof the inadequate conditions of their on‑going detention in post-conviction facilities.
CASE OF STUGAREV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 72087/17 and 11 others
The applicants complained of the inadequate conditions of detention during their transport.Some applicants also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
CASE OF CHUDINOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 71295/17 and 4 others
The applicants complained of the inadequate conditions of detention during their transport.They also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
CASE OF TEPLOV v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 69176/17
The applicant alleged that he did not receive adequate medical care in detention and that there was no effective remedy in that regard.