The applicants complained about theirconfinement in a metal cage in the courtroom during the criminal proceedings against them.
CASE OF TEPLYAKOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 31708/16 and 6 others
The applicants complained about theirconfinement in a metal cage in the courtroom during the criminal proceedings against them.
CASE OF TEKHNYUK v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 17112/16 and 2 others
The applicant complained of the permanent video surveillance of detainees in post-conviction detention facilities. He also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
CASE OF BLONSKI AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY (European Court of Human Rights) 12152/16 and 6 others
The cases concern the applicants’ sentences of life imprisonment with the possibility of release on parole once they have served a minimum term of between 30 and 40 years
CASE OF SHANOVSKYY v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 61431/15
The case concerns the allegedly unlawful continued detention and treatment in a psychiatric facility of the applicant since the end of 2012, which had been ordered
CASE OF POGORYELOV v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 19062/15
The application concerns the applicant’s two-day confinement in a psychiatric hospital following a request from his sister who, according to the applicant,
CASE OF KOLBAYA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 75645/14 and 7 others
The applicants complained of the inadequate conditions of detention during their transport.Some applicants also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
CASE OF SAMIGULLINY AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 61463/14 and 6 others
The applicants complained of the non-enforcement or delayed enforcement of domestic decisions and of the lack of any effective remedy in domestic law.
CASE OF KOZHAKHMETOVY AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 7072/14 and 4 others
The applicants complained about searches of their homes. They also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
CASE OF ARKHIPOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 26454/13 and 9 others
The applicants complained of torture or inhuman or degrading treatment. Some applicants also raised other complaints under various provisions of the Convention.