CASE OF NASKOV AND OTHERS v. NORTH MACEDONIA – European Court of Human Rights. Applications nos. 31620/15 and 2 others. The case concerns the applicants’ complaint under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention about a proprio motu…
Category: European Court of Human Rights
V v. the Czech Republic
Legal summary December 2023 V v. the Czech Republic – 26074/18 Judgment 7.12.2023 [Section V] Article 2 Positive obligations Article 2-1 Life Effective investigation Article 2-2 Use of force
CASE OF BORIS AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA – 2838/22 and 15 others
The applicants complained of the disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies.
CASE OF GALIMULLIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA – 54923/21 and 24 others
The applicants complained of the disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of nationwide protests in support of the jailed opposition leader, Aleksey Navalnyy.
CASE OF TARASENKO AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA – 51391/21 and 30 others
The applicants complained of the disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies.
CASE OF AZIZOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA – 51074/21 and 35 others
The applicants complained of the disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies.
CASE OF NADAREYSHVILI AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA – 41853/21 and 32 others
The applicants complained of the disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of nationwide protests in support of jailed opposition leader Aleksey Navalnyy.
CASE OF FROLOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA – 44292/18 and 41 others
The applicants complained of the disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies.
CASE OF OVCHAROV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA – The applicants complained of the unlawful detention (deprivation of liberty)
Having examined all the material submitted to it, the European Court of Human Rights has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion on the admissibility and merits of these complaints. Having regard…
CASE OF CHEREMSKYY v. UKRAINE – The application concerns the allegedly unlawful interference with the applicant’s right to freedom of assembly
The applicant complained that the local authorities and the courts had prohibited his peaceful assembly on far-fetched assumptions and their decisions had not been based on law, had not pursued a legitimate aim and had not been necessary in a…