The applicants whose names are listed in the appended table also complained under Article 13 of the Convention of the lack of an effective remedy for their complaints about poor conditions of detention during transport and under Article 3 about…
Category: European Court of Human Rights
CASE OF SVISHCHEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA – 6132/19 and 54 others. The applicants complained of the inadequate conditions of detention during their transport
The Court notes that the applicants were detained in poor conditions during transport. The Court refers to the principles established in its case‑law regarding cramped and defective conditions during the transit of prisoners. It reiterates in particular that a strong…
CASE OF PENKOVTSEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA – 5261/19 and 30 others. The applicants complained of the inadequate conditions of detention during their transport
Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion on the admissibility and merits of these complaints. Having regard to its case-law on…
CASE OF ZAYCHENKO AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA – 3341/19 and 29 others. The applicants complained of the inadequate conditions of detention during their transport
The Court notes that the applicants were detained in poor conditions during transport. The Court refers to the principles established in its case‑law regarding cramped and defective conditions during the transit of prisoners. It reiterates in particular that a strong…
CASE OF GRABLIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA – 48219/18 and 31 others. The applicants complained of the inadequate conditions of detention during their transport
The Court notes that the applicants were detained in poor conditions during transport. The Court refers to the principles established in its case‑law regarding cramped and defective conditions during the transit of prisoners. It reiterates in particular that a strong…
CASE OF VEGERA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA – 37150/18 and 30 others
The applicants complained of the inadequate conditions of detention during their transport.
CASE OF KONSHIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA – 37136/18 and 30 others
The applicants complained of the inadequate conditions of detention during their transport.
CASE OF PETERMAN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA – 51678/15 and 51 others. The applicants complained of the inadequate conditions of detention during their transport
The Court notes that the applicants were detained in poor conditions during transport. The Court refers to the principles established in its case‑law regarding cramped and defective conditions during the transit of prisoners. It reiterates in particular that a strong…
CASE OF ROMANIUK v. POLAND. The accused was not given the opportunity to question his co-defendant, whose testimony was crucial to his conviction
The issue in the case is whether the criminal proceedings against the applicant had been fair considering that he was not given an opportunity to examine or to have examined his co-defendant whose evidence was decisive for his conviction. Noting…
CASE OF FAZIYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA – 25056/14 and 49 others
The applicants complained of the inadequate conditions of detention during their transport. Some applicants also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.