Last Updated on January 18, 2024 by LawEuro
European Court of Human Rights
FIRST SECTION
CASE OF SKOROKHODOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
(Applications nos. 38070/21 and 27 others – see appended list)
JUDGMENT
STRASBOURG
18 January 2024
This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.
In the case of Skorokhodov and Others v. Russia,
The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:
Péter Paczolay, President,
Gilberto Felici,
Raffaele Sabato, judges,
and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,
Having deliberated in private on 14 December 2023,
Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:
PROCEDURE
1. The case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various dates indicated in the appended table.
2. The Russian Government (“the Government”) were given notice of the applications.
THE FACTS
3. The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table.
4. The applicants complained of the disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies. They also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
THE LAW
I. JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS
5. Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment.
II. JURISDICTION
6. The Court observes that the facts giving rise to the alleged violations of the Convention occurred prior to 16 September 2022, the date on which the Russian Federation ceased to be a party to the Convention. The Court therefore decides that it has jurisdiction to examine the present applications (see Fedotova and Others v. Russia [GC], nos. 40792/10 and 2 others, §§ 68‑73, 17 January 2023).
III. ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 11 OF THE CONVENTION
7. The applicants complained principally of disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies, namely their arrest in relation to the dispersal of these assemblies and their conviction for administrative offences. They relied, expressly or in substance, on Article 11 of the Convention.
8. The Court refers to the principles established in its case-law regarding freedom of assembly (see Kudrevičius and Others v. Lithuania [GC], no. 37553/05, ECHR 2015, with further references) and proportionality of interference with it (see Oya Ataman v. Turkey, no. 74552/01, ECHR 2006‑XIV, and Hyde Park and Others v. Moldova, no. 33482/06, 31 March 2009).
9. In the leading cases of Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, ECHR 2016 (extracts), Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, 4 December 2014, and Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, 3 October 2013, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case.
10. Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion as to the admissibility and merits of these complaints. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the interferences with the applicants’ freedom of assembly were not “necessary in a democratic society”.
11. These complaints are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention.
IV. OTHER ALLEGED VIOLATIONS UNDER WELL-ESTABLISHED CASE-LAW
12. The applicants submitted other complaints which also raised issues under the Convention and its Protocols, given the relevant well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table). These complaints are not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention, nor are they inadmissible on any other ground. Accordingly, they must be declared admissible.
13. Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that these complaints also disclose violations of the Convention and its Protocols in the light of its findings in Lashmankin and Others v. Russia, nos. 57818/09 and 14 others, § 489, 7 February 2017, Butkevich v. Russia, no. 5865/07, §§ 63-65, 13 February 2018, Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia, nos. 54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 115-31, 10 April 2018, and Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, §§ 34-36, 8 October 2019, as to various aspects of unlawful deprivation of liberty of organisers or participants of public assemblies; Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 58-85, 20 September 2016, concerning the absence of a prosecuting party in the proceedings under the Code of Administrative Offences (the CAO); Tsvetkova and Others, cited above, §§ 179-91, and Martynyuk v. Russia, no. 13764/15, §§ 38-42, 8 October 2019, relating to the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal against the sentence of administrative detention.
V. REMAINING COMPLAINTS
14. Some applicants raised further additional complaints under the Convention. In view of the findings in paragraphs above, the Court considers that there is no need to deal separately with these remaining complaints.
VI. APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION
15. Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case‑law (see in particular Navalnyy and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 25809/17 and 14 others, § 22, 4 October 2022), the Court finds it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table.
FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY,
1. Decides to join the applications;
2. Holds that it has jurisdiction to deal with these applications as they relate to facts that took place before 16 September 2022;
3. Declares the complaints under Article 11 of the Convention and the other complaints under the well-established case-law of the Court, as set out in the appended table, admissible, and finds that there is no need to examine separately the remaining complaints under the Convention raised by the applicants;
4. Holds that these complaints disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention;
5. Holds that there has been a violation of the Convention and the Protocols thereto as regards the other complaints raised under the well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table);
6. Holds
(a) that the respondent State is to pay the applicants, within three months, the amounts indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement;
(b) that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.
Done in English, and notified in writing on 18 January 2024, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.
Viktoriya Maradudina Péter Paczolay
Acting Deputy Registrar President
__________
APPENDIX
List of applications raising complaints under Article 11 of the Convention
(disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies)
| No. | Application no.
Date of introduction |
Applicant’s name
Year of birth |
Representative’s name and location | Name of the public event
Location Date |
Administrative charges (code of administrative offences, CAO) | Penalty | Final domestic decision
Court Name Date |
Other complaints under well-established case-law | Amount awarded for pecuniary and non‑pecuniary damage (in euros)[i] |
| 1. | 38070/21
14/07/2021 |
Nikita Valeryevich SKOROKHODOV
1996 |
Pershakova Yelena Yuryevna
Moscow |
Rally in support of Mr Navalnyy
Moscow 31/01/2021 |
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO | administrative detention of 10 days | Moscow City Court
12/03/2021 |
Art. 5 (1) – unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 11.40 a.m. on 31/01/2021 to 2.00 p.m. on 01/02/2021,
Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings – final decision: Moscow City Court, 12/03/2021, Prot. 7 Art. 2 – delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal – the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO. |
5,000 |
| 2. | 38179/21
16/07/2021 |
Filipp Freddiyevich KADENA
1996 |
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow |
Rally in support of Mr Navalnyy
Moscow 02/02/2021 |
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Moscow City Court
26/04/2021 |
Art. 5 (1) – unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 11.22 p.m. on 02/02/2021 to 6.57 a.m. on 03/02/2021,
Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings – final decision: Moscow City Court, 26/04/2021. |
4,000 |
| 3. | 41042/21
23/07/2021 |
Timofey Nikitich SOLOVOV
2000 |
Tevosov Georgiy Eduardovich
Moscow |
Rally in support of Mr Navalnyy
Moscow 03/02/2021 |
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO | administrative detention of 7 days | Moscow City Court
30/03/2021 |
Art. 5 (1) – unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 00.15 p.m. on 03/02/2021 to 04/02/2021, hearing in the applicant’s administrative-offence case,
Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings – final decision: Moscow City Court, 30/03/2021. |
5,000 |
| 4. | 41079/21
28/07/2021 |
Daniil Antonovich SHESTAKOV
1997 |
Bochilo Anna Yevgenyevna
Barnaul |
Rally in support to Mr Navalnyy
Perm 23/01/2021 Rally (march) in support of Mr Navalnyy Perm 31/01/2021 Hybrid political rally (demonstration and march) Perm 21/04/2021 |
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
article 20.2 § 8 of CAO |
fine of RUB 10,000
fine of RUB 10,000
administrative detention of 10 days |
Perm Regional Court
13/04/2021
Perm Regional Court 03/09/2021
Perm Regional Court 30/04/2021 |
Art. 5 (1) – unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”:
– from 9.00 p.m. on 23/01/2021 (few hours after the end of the rally) to 00.00 a.m. on 24/01/2021, while the said record was drawn up later; the applicant’s deprivation of liberty was not recorded in any way, – from 1.40 p.m. to 6.00 p.m. on 31/01/2021, – from 3.00 p.m. on 22/04/2021 to 23/04/2021, hearing in the applicant’s administrative-offence case, Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings – final decisions: Perm City Court, 13/04/2021, 30/04/2021 and 03/09/2021, Prot. 7 Art. 2 – delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal – the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant by the court of first instance was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO. |
5,000 |
| 5. | 43685/21
16/08/2021 |
Fedor Konstantinovich KOLESNICHENKO
1995 |
Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich
Vilnius |
Rally in support to Mr Navalnyy
Moscow 23/01/2021 |
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 20,000 | Moscow City Court
04/03/2021 |
Art. 5 (1) – unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 7.00 p.m. on 23/01/2021 to 25/01/2021, hearing in the applicant’s administrative-offence case.
Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings – final decision: Moscow City Court, 04/03/2021. |
4,000 |
| 6. | 45063/21
02/09/2021 |
Anastasiya Aleksandrovna POPOVA
1992 |
Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich
Vilnius |
Rally in support of Mr Navalnyy
Syktyvkar, Komi Republic 31/01/2021 |
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Supreme Court of the Komi Republic
17/03/2021 |
Art. 5 (1) – unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 1.55 p.m. to 9.15 p.m. on 31/01/2021,
Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings – final decision: Supreme Court of the Komi Republic, 17/03/2021. |
4,000 |
| 7. | 45070/21
09/08/2021 |
Varvara Yuryevna ZHARKAYA
1983 |
Karavayev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich
Nizhniy Novgorod |
Rally in support of Mr Navalnyy
Moscow 02/02/2021 |
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO | administrative detention of 10 days | Moscow City Court
10/02/2021 |
Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings – final decision: Moscow City Court, 10/02/2021. | 5,000 |
| 8. | 45707/21
26/08/2021 |
Aleksandra Olegovna VORONINA
1991 |
Zubarev Dmitriy Vladimirovich
Vladivostok |
Rally in support of Mr Navalnyy
Vladivostok 31/01/2021 |
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 15,000 | Primorye Regional Court
30/03/2021 |
Art. 5 (1) – unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 2.10 p.m. to 7.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021,
Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings – final decision: Primorye Regional Court, 30/03/2021. |
4,000 |
| 9. | 46123/21
10/09/2021 |
Sergey Valeryevich GOROKHOV
1974 |
|
Rally in support of Mr Navalnyy
Volgograd 23/01/2021 |
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Volgograd Regional Court
24/03/2021 |
Art. 5 (1) – unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 3.45 p.m. to 9.30 p.m. on 23/01/2021,
Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings – final decision: Volgograd Regional Court, 24/03/2021. |
4,000 |
| 10. | 46221/21
10/09/2021 |
Konstantin Olegovich ZARUBA
1990 |
Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich
Vilnius |
Rally in support of Mr Navalnyy
Moscow 31/01/2021 |
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 15,000 | Moscow City Court
22/03/2021 |
Art. 5 (1) – unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 5.30 p.m. to 10.00 p.m. on 31/01/2021,
Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings – final decision: Moscow City Court, 22/03/2021. |
4,000 |
| 11. | 46427/21
03/09/2021 |
Vladislav Romanovich KACHEROV
2000 |
Vertegel Feliks Yevgenyevich
Krasnodar |
Rally in support of Mr Navalnyy
Krasnodar 23/01/2021 |
article 20.2 § 2 of CAO | administrative detention of 1 day | Krasnodar Regional Court
15/03/2021 |
Art. 5 (1) – unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 5.20 p.m. on 23/01/2021 to 24/01/2021, hearing in the applicant’s administrative-offence case,
Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings – final decision: Krasnodar Regional Court, 15/03/2021. |
4,000 |
| 12. | 46699/21
17/09/2021 |
Yekaterina Mikhaylovna VANSLOVA
1990 |
Zadorozhnaya Mariya Aleksandrovna
Nizhniy Novgorod |
Rally in support of Mr Navalnyy
Nizhniy Novgorod 31/01/2021 |
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court
18/03/2021 |
Art. 5 (1) – unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 1.40 p.m. on 31/01/2021 to 1.00 p.m. on 01/02/2021, hearing in the applicant’s administrative-offence case,
Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings – final decision: Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court, 18/03/2021. |
4,000 |
| 13. | 47009/21
15/09/2021 |
Yelena Valeriyevna YEVSEYEVA
1977 |
Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich
Vilnius |
Rally in support of Mr Navalnyy
Saransk, Republic of Mordovia 31/01/2021 |
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Supreme Court of the Mordovia Republic
24/03/2021 |
Art. 5 (1) – unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 1.30 p.m. to 10.00 p.m. on 31/01/2021,
Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings – final decision: Supreme Court of the Mordovia Republic, 24/03/2021. |
4,000 |
| 14. | 47891/21
07/09/2021 |
Sergey Nikolayevich DYADKIN
1969 |
Kosheleva Inna Viktorovna
Kirov |
Rally in support of Mr Navalnyy
Kirov 23/01/2021 Rally in support of Mr Navalnyy Kirov 31/01/2021 |
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO |
fine of RUB 10,000
fine of RUB 10,000 |
Kirov Regional Court
09/03/2021
Kirov Regional Court 25/05/2021 |
Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings – final decisions: Kirov Regional Court, 09/03/2021 and 25/05/2021. | 4,000 |
| 15. | 48359/21
23/09/2021 |
Denis Aleksandrovich TASKIN
1990 |
Valenkov Andrey Olegovich
Nizhniy Novgorod |
Rally in support of Mr Navalnyy
Nizhniy Novgorod 31/01/2021 |
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court
24/03/2021 |
Art. 5 (1) – unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 1.20 p.m. on 31/01/2021 to 3.00 p.m. on 01/02/2021,
Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings – final decision: Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court, 24/03/2021. |
4,000 |
| 16. | 49416/21
01/10/2021 |
Vladislav Kirillovich SHTUKATUROV
1997 |
Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich
Vilnius |
Rally in support to Mr Navalnyy
Ryazan 23/01/2021 |
article 20.2 § 2 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Ryazan Regional Court
08/04/2021 |
Art. 5 (1) – unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 2.20 p.m. on 23/01/2021 to 10.25 a.m. on 24/01/2021, hearing in the applicant’s administrative-offence case,
Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings – final decision: Ryazan Regional Court, 08/04/2021. |
4,000 |
| 17. | 49480/21
01/10/2021 |
Oleg Nikolayevich TOTSKIY
2002 |
Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich
Vilnius |
Rally in support to Mr Navalnyy
Vladivostok 23/01/2021 |
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Primorye Regional Court
12/04/2021 |
Art. 5 (1) – unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 3.00 p.m. to 10.00 p.m. on 23/01/2021, while the said record was drawn up only on 01/03/2021,
Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings – final decision: Primorye Regional Court, 12/04/2021. |
4,000 |
| 18. | 49512/21
01/10/2021 |
Ron Igorevich DEYCH
2000 |
Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich
Vilnius |
Rally in support of Mr Navalnyy
Nizhniy Novgorod 31/01/2021 |
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court
07/04/2021 |
Art. 5 (1) unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 12.05 p.m. on 31/01/2021 to 02/02/2010, hearing in the applicant’s administrative-offence case,
Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings – final decision: Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court, 07/04/2021. |
4,000 |
| 19. | 49677/21
16/09/2021 |
Angelina Vladimirovna BURDAKOVA
1994 |
Nurgaleyev Danil Ilnurovich
Kazan |
Rally in support of Mr Navalnyy
Kazan 31/01/2021 |
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic
31/03/2021 |
3,500 | |
| 20. | 49679/21
17/09/2021 |
Yelena Vasilyevna GULINA
1968 |
Mezak Ernest Aleksandrovich
Saint-Barthélemy-d’Anjou |
Rally in support of Mr Navalnyy
Syktyvkar 23/01/2021 Rally in support of Mr Navalnyy Syktyvkar 31/01/2021 |
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO |
fine of RUB 10,000
fine of RUB 10,000 |
Supreme Court of the Komi Republic
12/05/2021
Supreme Court of the Komi Republic 17/03/2021 |
Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings – final decisions: Supreme Court of the Komi Republic, 17/03/2021 and12/05/2021 | 4,000 |
| 21. | 49714/21
17/09/2021 |
Kirill Alekseyevich FOKIN
1999 |
Kosnyrev Vladislav Vladimirovich
Syktyvkar |
Rally in support of Mr Navalnyy
Syktyvkar 03/02/2021 |
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Supreme Court of the Komi Republic
17/03/2021 |
Art. 5 (1) – unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 1.00 p.m. to 9.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021,
Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings – final decision: Supreme Court of the Komi Republic, 17/03/2021. |
4,000 |
| 22. | 49723/21
17/09/2021 |
Galina Aleksandrovna LOGINOVSKIKH
1965 |
Kosnyrev Vladislav Vladimirovich
Syktyvkar |
Rally in support of Mr Navalnyy
Syktyvkar 31/01/2021 |
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Supreme Court of the Komi Republic
17/03/2021 |
Art. 5 (1) – unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 1.45 p.m. to 8.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021,
Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings – final decision: Supreme Court of the Komi Republic, 17/03/2021 |
4,000 |
| 23. | 50084/21
24/09/2021 |
Ilya Andreyevich YUDIN
1993 |
|
Rally in support of Mr Navalnyy
Samara 31/01/2021 |
article 20.2 § 2 of CAO | administrative detention of 7 days | Samara Regional Court
01/04/2021 |
Art. 5 (1) – unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 2.00 p.m. on 31/01/2021 to 9.00 a.m. on 01/02/2021, hearing in the applicant’s administrative-offence case,
Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings – final decision: Samara Regional Court, 01/04/2021. |
5,000 |
| 24. | 50105/21
21/09/2021 |
Yekaterina Yuryevna SURIKOVA
2002 |
Aksenova Darya Dmitriyevna
Kolomna |
Rally in support of Mr Navalnyy
Moscow 31/01/2021 |
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 15,000 | Moscow City Court
22/03/2021 |
Art. 5 (1) – unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 3.15 p.m. to 10.15 p.m. on 31/01/2021,
Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings – final decision: Moscow City Court, 22/03/2021. |
4,000 |
| 25. | 50477/21
29/09/2021 |
Yevgeniy Sergeyevich DRUSHCHENKO
1990 |
Vertegel Feliks Yevgenyevich
Krasnodar |
Rally in support of Mr Navalnyy
Krasnodar 23/01/2021 |
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Krasnodar Regional Court
31/03/2021 |
Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings – final decision: Krasnodar Regional Court, 31/03/2021. | 3,500 |
| 26. | 50671/21
29/09/2021 |
Daniil Vladimirovich PROKOPENKO
1991 |
Dubrovina Marina Alekseyevna
Novorossiysk |
Rally in support of Mr Navalnyy
Anapa 31/01/2021 |
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 18,000 | Krasnodar Regional Court
29/03/2021 |
Art. 5 (1) – unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 1.50 p.m. to 8.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021,
Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings – final decision: Krasnodar Regional Court, 29/03/2021. |
4,000 |
| 27. | 50901/21
01/10/2021 |
Andrey Konstantinovich ROMANOV
1998 |
Aksenova Darya Dmitriyevna
Kolomna |
Rally in support of Mr Navalnyy
Moscow 23/01/2021 |
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | community works of 30 hours | Moscow City Court
22/04/2021 |
Art. 5 (1) – unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence on 23/01/2021,
Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings – final decision: Moscow City Court, 22/04/2021. |
5,000 |
| 28. | 50963/21
30/09/2021 |
Aleksandr Yuryevich PESKOV
1996 |
Kuroptev Aleksey Mikhaylovich
Balashikha |
Rally in support of Mr Navalnyy
Cherepovets 31/01/2021 |
article 20.2 § 2 of CAO | fine of RUB 20,000 | Vologda Regional Court
01/04/2021 |
Art. 5 (1) – unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 11.55 a.m. to 4.00 p.m. on 31/01/2021,
Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings – final decision: Vologda Regional Court, 01/04/2021,
|
4,000 |
[i] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.
Leave a Reply