CASE OF PETROVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

Last Updated on February 1, 2024 by LawEuro

The applicants complained of the disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies.

---

European Court of Human Rights
SECOND SECTION
CASE OF PETROVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
(Applications nos. 55480/21 and 38 others – see appended list)
JUDGMENT
STRASBOURG
1 February 2024

This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.

In the case of Petrova and Others v. Russia,

The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:
Lorraine Schembri Orland, President,
Frédéric Krenc,
Davor Derenčinović, judges,
and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,

Having deliberated in private on 11 January 2024,

Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:

PROCEDURE

1. The case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various dates indicated in the appended table.

2. The Russian Government (“the Government”) were given notice of the applications.

THE FACTS

3. The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table.

4. The applicants complained of the disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies. They also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.

THE LAW

I. JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS

5. Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment.

II. JURISDICTION

6. The Court observes that the facts giving rise to the alleged violations of the Convention occurred prior to 16 September 2022, the date on which the Russian Federation ceased to be a party to the Convention. The Court therefore decides that it has jurisdiction to examine the present applications (see Fedotova and Others v. Russia [GC], nos. 40792/10 and 2 others, §§ 68‑73, 17 January 2023).

III. ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 11 OF THE CONVENTION

7. The applicants complained principally of disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies, namely their arrest in relation to the dispersal of these assemblies and their conviction for administrative offences. They relied, expressly or in substance, on Article 11 of the Convention.

8. The Court refers to the principles established in its case-law regarding freedom of assembly (see Kudrevičius and Others v. Lithuania [GC], no. 37553/05, ECHR 2015, with further references) and proportionality of interference with it (see Oya Ataman v. Turkey, no. 74552/01, ECHR 2006‑XIV, and Hyde Park and Others v. Moldova, no. 33482/06, 31 March 2009).

9. In the leading cases of Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, ECHR 2016 (extracts), Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, 4 December 2014, and Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, 3 October 2013, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case.

10. Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion as to the admissibility and merits of these complaints. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the interferences with the applicants’ freedom of assembly were not “necessary in a democratic society”.

11. These complaints are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention.

IV. OTHER ALLEGED VIOLATIONS UNDER WELL-ESTABLISHED CASE-LAW

12. Some applicants submitted other complaints which also raised issues under the Convention and its Protocols, given the relevant well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table). These complaints are not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention, nor are they inadmissible on any other ground. Accordingly, they must be declared admissible.

13. Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that these complaints also disclose violations of the Convention and its Protocols in the light of its findings in Butkevich v. Russia, no. 5865/07, §§ 63-65, 13 February 2018, Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia, nos. 54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 115-31, 10 April 2018, and Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, §§ 34-36, 8 October 2019, as to various aspects of unlawful deprivation of liberty of organisers or participants of public assemblies; Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 58-85, 20 September 2016, concerning the absence of a prosecuting party in the proceedings under the Code of Administrative Offences (the CAO); Martynyuk v. Russia, no. 13764/15, §§ 38-42, 8 October 2019, relating to the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal against the sentence of administrative detention.

V. REMAINING COMPLAINTS

14. Some applicants raised further complaints under Article 6 of the Convention alleging various aspects of unfairness of the administrative‑offence proceedings. In view of the findings in paragraphs 11 and 13 above, the Court considers that there is no need to deal separately with these remaining complaints.

VI. APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION

15. Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case‑law (see in particular Navalnyy and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 25809/17 and 14 others, § 22, 4 October 2022), the Court finds it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table.

FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY,

1. Decides to join the applications;

2. Holds that it has jurisdiction to deal with these applications as they relate to facts that took place before 16 September 2022;

3. Declares the complaints under Article 11 of the Convention and the other complaints under the well-established case-law of the Court, as set out in the appended table, admissible, and finds that there is no need to examine separately the remaining complaints under Article 6 of the Convention;

4. Holds that these complaints disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention;

5. Holds that there has been a violation of the Convention and the Protocols thereto as regards the other complaints raised under the well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table);

6. Holds

(a) that the respondent State is to pay the applicants, within three months, the amounts indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement;

(b) that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.

Done in English, and notified in writing on 1 February 2024, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.

Viktoriya Maradudina                 Lorraine Schembri Orland
Acting Deputy Registrar                    President

___________

APPENDIX
List of applications raising complaints under Article 11 of the Convention
(disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies)

No.	Application no. Date of introduction	Applicant’s name Year of birth	Representative’s name and location	Name of the public event Location Date	Administrative charges	Penalty	Final domestic decision Court Name Date	Other complaints under well-established case-law	Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant (in euros)[i]
1.	55480/21 22/10/2021	Regina Vyacheslavovna PETROVA 2000	Aleksey Alekseyevich Vasilyev Moscow	Rally “Free Navalnyy” Moscow 23/01/2021	article 20.2 § 5 of CAO	fine of RUB 10,000	Moscow City Court 22/04/2021	Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings; Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 23/01/2021 until 24/01/2021	4,000
2.	57859/21 18/11/2021	Kirill Vitalyevich KUZNETSOV 2002	Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow	Rally “Free Navalnyy” Moscow 02/02/2021	article 20.2 § 5 of CAO	fine of RUB 18,000	Moscow City Court 19/05/2021	Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings; Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – escorting to the police station on 02/02/2021 for compiling an offence report	4,000
3.	57867/21 18/11/2021	Aleksandr Petrovich KLYUKIN 1957	Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow	Rally “Free Navalnyy” Moscow 02/02/2021	article 20.2 § 5 of CAO	fine of RUB 20,000	Moscow City Court 25/05/2021	Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings; Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – escorting to the police station on 02/02/2021 for compiling an offence report	4,000
4.	58305/21 20/11/2021	Aleksey Sergeyevich GOROKHOV 1992	Andrey Olegovich Valenkov Nizhniy Novgorod	Rally “Free Navalnyy” Nizhniy Novgorod 31/01/2021	article 20.2 § 5 of CAO	fine of RUB 5,000	Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court 20/05/2021	Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling an offence report; Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.	4,000
5.	58776/21 25/11/2021	Vitaliy Olegovich NAZARENKO 1997	Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow	Rally “Free Navalnyy” Moscow 31/01/2021	article 20.2 § 5 of CAO	fine of RUB 20,000	Moscow City Court 27/05/2021	Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling an offence report; Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.	4,000
6.	59089/21 20/11/2021	Yelena Eduardovna PETROVICHEVA 1995	Andrey Olegovich Valenkov Nizhniy Novgorod	Rally “Free Navalnyy” Nizhniy Novgorod 31/01/2021	article 20.2 § 5 of CAO	fine of RUB 10,000	Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court 20/05/2021	Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling an offence report	4,000
7.	59453/21 25/11/2021	Aleksey Yuryevich FONOV 1994	Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow	Rally “Free Navalnyy” Moscow 31/01/2021	article 20.2 § 5 of CAO	fine of RUB 10,000	Moscow City Court 27/05/2021	Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling an offence report; Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.	4,000
8.	59602/21 17/11/2021	Yelena Anatolyevna GORBAN 1992	Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow	Rally to support Azat Miftakhov Moscow 25/12/2020	article 20.2 § 5 of CAO	fine of RUB 10,000	Moscow City Court 17/05/2021	Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings	3,500
9.	59660/21 17/11/2021	Veniamin Nikolayevich BLINOV 1988	Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow	Rally “Free Navalnyy” Moscow 31/01/2021	article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO	fine of RUB 10,000	Moscow City Court 17/05/2021	Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings; Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 1.10 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 10.00 a.m. on 02/02/2021	4,000
10.	59770/21 01/12/2021	Anton Mikhaylovich ANDREYEV 1999	Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow	Rally “Free Navalnyy” Moscow 02/02/2021	article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO	fine of RUB 10,000	Moscow City Court 11/06/2021	Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 9.30 p.m. on 02/02/2021 until 4.30 p.m. on 03/02/2021; Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.	4,000
11.	59846/21 29/11/2021	Dmitriy Aleksandrovich CHERNYSHOV 1966	Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow	Rally “Free Navalnyy” Moscow 21/04/2021	article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO	detention of 14 days	Moscow City Court 29/06/2021	Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings; Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 12.30 p.m. on 25/04/2021 until 6.00 p.m. on 26/04/2021; Prot. 7 Art. 2 – delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal – the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO	5,000
12.	59865/21 29/11/2021	Vladimir Aleksandrovich CHERKASOV 2001	Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow	Rally “Free Navalnyy” Moscow 23/01/2021	article 20.2 § 5 of CAO	fine of RUB 15,000	Moscow City Court 01/06/2021	Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings; Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – escorting to the police station on 23/01/2021 for compiling an offence report	4,000
13.	59879/21 29/11/2021	Sergey Yuryevich NIKULIN 1990	Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow	Rally “Free Navalnyy” Kirov 23/01/2021	article 20.2 § 5 of CAO	fine of RUB 5,000	Kirov Regional Court 01/06/2021	Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings	3,500
14.	60051/21 01/12/2021	David Sergeyevich TE 1994	Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow	Rally “Free Navalnyy” Moscow 31/01/2021	article 20.2 § 5 of CAO	fine of RUB 15,000	Moscow City Court 11/06/2021	Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling an offence report; Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.	4,000
15.	60064/21 01/12/2021	Anatoliy Valeryevich OPARIN 1977	Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow	Rally “Free Navalnyy” Moscow 02/02/2021	article 20.2 § 5 of CAO	fine of RUB 10,000	Moscow City Court 03/08/2021	Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – escorting to the police station on 02/02/2021 for compiling an offence report; Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.	4,000
16.	60078/21 25/11/2021	Sergey Leonidovich TIKHONOV 1985	Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow	Rally “Free Navalnyy” Moscow 02/02/2021	article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO	fine of RUB 10,000	Moscow City Court 25/05/2021	Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings; Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 10.45 p.m. on 02/02/2021 until 6.00 p.m. on 04/02/2021	4,000
17.	60083/21 24/11/2021	Ivan Aleksandrovich SUROV 1986	Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow	Rally “Free Navalnyy” Tula 31/01/2021	article 20.2 § 5 of CAO	fine of RUB 15,000	Tula Regional Court 24/05/2021	Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings; Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report on 31/01/2021	4,000
18.	60094/21 20/11/2021	Diana Denisovna DYNINA 1993	Vladimir Sergeyevich Nemanov Moscow	Rally “Free Navalnyy” Moscow 31/01/2021	article 20.2 § 5 of CAO	fine of RUB 15,000	Moscow City Court 29/09/2021	Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings; Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling an offence report	4,000
19.	60133/21 06/12/2021	Pavel Sergeyevich SEREGIN 1993	Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow	Rally “Free Navalnyy” Moscow 31/01/2021	article 20.2 § 5 of CAO	fine of RUB 20,000	Moscow City Court 09/06/2021	Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling an offence report; Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.	4,000
20.	60139/21 16/11/2021	Yevgeniy Vyacheslavovich YEVCHENKO 1990	Sofya Zurabovna Sharangiya Nizhniy Novgorod	Rally “Free Navalnyy” Nizhniy Novgorod 31/01/2021	article 20.2 § 5 of CAO	fine of RUB 10,000	Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court 27/05/2021	Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings; Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling an offence report	4,000
21.	60205/21 24/11/2021	Tatyana Sergeyevna NIKOLAYEVA 1998	Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow	Rally “Free Navalnyy” Kazan 21/04/2021	article 20.2 § 5 of CAO	fine of RUB 10,000	Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic 02/06/2021	Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 21/04/2021 until 22/04/2021	4,000
22.	60489/21 24/11/2021	Nikolay Aleksandrovich PANOV 1996	Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow	Rally “Free Navalnyy” Moscow 31/01/2021	article 20.2 § 5 of CAO	fine of RUB 20,000	Moscow City Court 09/06/2021	Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings; Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling an offence report	4,000
23.	60647/21 16/11/2021	Mikhail Yevgenyevich PESTOV 1986	Sofya Zurabovna Sharangiya Nizhniy Novgorod	Rally “Free Navalnyy” Nizhniy Novgorod 31/01/2021	article 20.2 § 5 of CAO	fine of RUB 10,000	Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court 11/08/2021	Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings; Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling an offence report	4,000
24.	60989/21 29/11/2021	Sofya Aleksandrovna NECHAYEVA 2000	Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow	Rally “Free Navalnyy” Naberezhnye Chelny 21/04/2021	article 20.2 § 5 of CAO	fine of RUB 10,000	Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic 02/06/2021	Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 8.45 p.m. on 21/04/2021 until 3.20 a.m. on 22/04/2021	4,000
25.	61020/21 30/11/2021	Sergey Vladimirovich SAVINOV 1966	Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow	Rally “Free Navalnyy” Moscow 02/02/2021	article 20.2 § 5 of CAO	fine of RUB 10,000	Moscow City Court 01/06/2021	Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings; Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – escorting to the police station on 02/02/2021 for compiling an offence report	4,000
26.	61105/21 06/12/2021	Aleksey Valeryevich ORLOV 1990	Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow	Rally “Free Navalnyy” Yekaterinburg 21/04/2021	article 20.2 § 5 of CAO	fine of RUB 19,000	Sverdlovsk Regional Court 11/08/2021	Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – escorting to the police station on 21/04/2021 for compiling an offence report; Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.	4,000
27.	61127/21 06/12/2021	Ivan Aleksandrovich YEMELYANOV 1993	Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow	Rally “Free Navalnyy” Moscow 31/01/2021	article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO	fine of RUB 10,000	Moscow City Court 09/06/2021	Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling an offence report; Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.	4,000
28.	61246/21 19/11/2021	Sergey Ruslanovich SEMENOV 1988	Olimpiada Valentinovna Usanova Nizhniy Novgorod	Rally “Free Navalnyy” Nizhniy Novgorod 31/01/2021	article 20.2 § 5 of CAO	fine of RUB 10,000	Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court 27/05/2021	Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings; Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling an offence report	4,000
29.	61254/21 19/11/2021	Nikita Andreyevich PANFILOV 2002	Olimpiada Valentinovna Usanova Nizhniy Novgorod	Rally “Free Navalnyy” Nizhniy Novgorod 23/01/2021	article 20.2 § 5 of CAO	fine of RUB 10,000	Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court 20/05/2021	Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – escorting to the police station on 23/01/2021 for compiling an offence report; Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.	4,000
30.	61261/21 19/11/2021	Yakov Andreyevich SHUTOV 1985	Olimpiada Valentinovna Usanova Nizhniy Novgorod	Rally “Free Navalnyy” Nizhniy Novgorod 31/01/2021	article 20.2 § 5 of CAO	fine of RUB 10,000	Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court 20/05/2021	Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings; Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling an offence report	4,000
31.	61307/21 19/11/2021	Nikita Alekseyevich BORODIN 1999	Daniil Alekseyevich Polyakov Voronezh	Rally “Free Navalnyy” Voronezh 31/01/2021	article 20.2 § 5 of CAO	fine of RUB 10,000	Voronezh Regional Court 20/05/2021	Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling an offence report; Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.	4,000
32.	61343/21 19/11/2021	Irina Aleksandrovna PAKHOMOVA 1999	Olimpiada Valentinovna Usanova Nizhniy Novgorod	Rally “Free Navalnyy” Nizhniy Novgorod 31/01/2021	article 20.2 § 5 of CAO	fine of RUB 10,000	Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court 20/05/2021	Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings; Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling an offence report	4,000
33.	61358/21 03/12/2021	Marina Vladimirovna SOKOLOVSKAYA 1986	Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow	Rally “Free Navalnyy” Kazan 21/04/2021	article 20.2 § 5 of CAO	fine of RUB 5,000	Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic 26/05/2021 (served on the applicant 14/10/2021)	Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – escorting to the police station on 21/04/2021 for compiling an offence report	4,000
34.	61457/21 19/11/2021	Viktoriya Viktorovna PEREVOZCHIKOVA 1978	Olimpiada Valentinovna Usanova Nizhniy Novgorod	Rally “Free Navalnyy” Nizhniy Novgorod 31/01/2021	article 20.2 § 5 of CAO	fine of RUB 5,000	Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court 20/05/2021	Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings; Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling an offence report	4,000
35.	61468/21 06/12/2021	Aleksandr Nikolayevich PROKOFYEV 1987	Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow	Rally “Free Navalnyy” Moscow 02/02/2021	article 20.2 § 5 of CAO	fine of RUB 10,000	Moscow City Court 11/06/2021	Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings; Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – escorting to the police station on 02/02/2021 for compiling an offence report	4,000
36.	61469/21 19/11/2021	Anna Vladimirovna SHUTOVA 1990	Olimpiada Valentinovna Usanova Nizhniy Novgorod	Rally “Free Navalnyy” Nizhniy Novgorod 31/01/2021	article 20.2 § 5 of CAO	fine of RUB 10,000	Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court 20/05/2021	Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings; Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling an offence report	4,000
37.	61517/21 19/11/2021	Irina Anatolyevna PYZHOVA 1993	Olimpiada Valentinovna Usanova Nizhniy Novgorod	Rally “Free Navalnyy” Nizhniy Novgorod 31/01/2021	article 20.2 § 5 of CAO	fine of RUB 10,000	Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court 27/05/2021	Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings; Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling an offence report	4,000
38.	61731/21 10/12/2021	Maksim Ildarovich KARIMOV 1997	Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow	Rally “Free Navalnyy” Surgut 21/04/2021	article 20.2 § 5 of CAO	fine of RUB 15,000	Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Regional Court 24/06/2021	Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings; Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – escorting to the police station on 21/04/2021 for compiling an offence report	4,000
39.	61734/21 10/12/2021	Timofey Romanovich ZAKHAROV 1986	Kseniya Dmitriyevna Prosvirkina Moscow	Rally “Free Navalnyy” Nizhniy Novgorod 31/01/2021	article 20.2 § 5 of CAO	fine of RUB 10,000	Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court 11/08/2021	Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings; Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling an offence report	4,000

[i] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.