The applicant complained of the excessive length of his pre-trial detention. He also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
CASE OF CHERNOZUB v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 8777/12
The applicant complained of the unlawful detention (deprivation of liberty). He also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
CASE OF AGORA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 28539/10 and 2 others
The applicants complained of searches of their professional premises. They also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
CASE OF BRESHCHANOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 33120/08 and 10 others
The applicants complained of the inadequate conditions of detention during their transport.Some applicants also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
Pavlov and Others v. Russia (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 267 October 2022 Pavlov and Others v. Russia – 31612/09 Judgment 11.10.2022 [Section III]
S.F.K. v. Russia (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 267 October 2022 S.F.K. v. Russia – 5578/12 Judgment 11.10.2022 [Section III]
Kotov and Others v. Russia (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 267 October 2022 Kotov and Others v. Russia – 6142/18, 51015/18, 51020/18 et al. Judgment 11.10.2022 [Section III]
Coventry v. the United Kingdom (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 267 October 2022 Coventry v. the United Kingdom – 6016/16 Judgment 11.10.2022 [Section IV]
Beeler v. Switzerland [GC] (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 267 October 2022 Beeler v. Switzerland [GC] – 78630/12 Judgment 11.10.2022 [GC]
CASE OF I.U. AND Z.K. v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 12767/20
The case concerns risk of treatment contrary to Article 3 of the Convention in the event of the applicants’ removal to Uzbekistan.