The similar applications by two lawyers concern the fact that it was impossible for them to challenge decisions by which judges had removed them from court proceedings for obstructing the proceedings
CASE OF KARA-MURZA v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 2513/14
The case concerns the annulment of the applicant’s registration as a candidate for election to a regional legislature on the ground of his having two nationalities.
CASE OF DE LEGÉ v. THE NETHERLANDS (European Court of Human Rights) 58342/15
The case concerns the use of documents for the re-setting of a tax fine. Those documents relate to a foreign bank account and had been obtained from the applicant under threat of substantial penalty payments.
CASE OF KOPIĆ v. CROATIA (European Court of Human Rights) 16789/19
The applicant complained of the inadequate conditions of his detention.
CASE OF LUKASH AND MAGDALITS v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 57967/15 and 37540/16
The applicants complained of the unlawful detention.
CASE OF KLESHCHEVNIKOV AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 48458/13 and 2 others
The applicants complained of the inadequate conditions of their detention and of the lack of any effective remedy in domestic law.
CASE OF MAKSIMENKO v. UKRAINE (No. 2) (European Court of Human Rights) 45547/13
The present case concerns the applicant’s complaints under Articles 3 and 8 of the Convention about his handcuffing in a courtroom and, under Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (c) of the Convention,
CASE OF SOROKOUMOV AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 44584/13 and 4 others
The applicants complained of the excessive length of their pre-trial detention. Some applicants also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
CASE OF GUSMERINI AND OTHERS v. ITALY (European Court of Human Rights) 50345/10 and 5 others
The applicants lodged claims with the national courts, contending that the INPS’s calculation methods were contrary to the spirit of the Italo-Swiss Convention.
CASE OF LACEJ AND OTHERS v. ALBANIA (European Court of Human Rights) 22122/08
The applicants complained in substance of the excessive length of civil proceedings, in particular those before the Supreme Court.