The applicant complained of the non-enforcement of a domestic decision given against a socially/State-owned company.
CASE OF SHEVCHENKO AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 31312/20 and 2 others
The applicants complained of the excessive length of civil proceedings and of the lack of any effective remedy in domestic law.
CASE OF GERASYUTIN AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 23698/20 and 3 others
The applicants complained of the excessive length of criminal proceedings and of the lack of any effective remedy in domestic law.
CASE OF MEHMEDOVIĆ AND OTHERS v. SERBIA (European Court of Human Rights) 23202/20 and 14 others
The case originated in applications against Serbia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms
CASE OF PACE v. MALTA (European Court of Human Rights) 53545/19
The application concerns a unilaterally imposed lease under Act XXIII of 1979 amending Chapter 158 of the Laws of Malta, the Housing Decontrol Ordinance
CASE OF OTITE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM (European Court of Human Rights) 18339/19
The applicant complained that his expulsion would breach his right to respect for his private and family life as provided for by Article 8 of the Convention, and that the final domestic decision
CASE OF VASYLKOV v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 77801/13
The application concerns an issue of fair trial raised under Article 6 of the Convention in relation to administrative-offence proceedings against the applicant,
CASE OF GENERALNYY BUDIVELNYY MENEDZHMENT v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 11925/09
The applicant company complained under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention that the national courts had overturned two final decisions given in its favour after the expiry of the time-limit
CASE OF GEMU v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 16025/06
The case concerns the applicant’s allegations that the criminal proceedings against him were unfair (Article 6 of the Convention), that the medical treatment he received while in detention
CASE OF IGOR LUTSENKO v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 6251/14
The case mainly concerns: the alleged violation of the applicant’s rights under Article 11, as well as Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (d) of the Convention, in respect of the administrative offence proceedings against