The case originated in two applications against Ukraine lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”).
CASE OF ANASTASI AND OTHERS v. MALTA (European Court of Human Rights) 49102/19 and 2 others
The facts of this case are substantially the same as those described in Bartolo Parnis and Others v. Malta ((dec.), nos. 49378/18 and 3 others, 24 March 2020),
CASE OF KRYUK v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 43993/19 and 2 others
The applicant alleged that he did not receive adequate medical care in detention. He also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
CASE OF KATANOVIĆ AND MIHOVILOVIĆ v. CROATIA (European Court of Human Rights) 18208/19 and 12922/20
The applicants complained of the inadequate conditions of their detention.
CASE OF HRNČIĆ v. CROATIA (European Court of Human Rights) 53563/16
The applicant complained of the inadequate conditions of his detention.
CASE OF ALBÓK AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY (European Court of Human Rights) 49178/21 and 9 others
The applicants complained of the excessive length of their pre-trial detention. Some applicants also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
CASE OF KOROL v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 15518/21
The case originated in an application against Ukraine lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms
CASE OF DRAZHNYK AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 55957/20 and 8 others
The applicants complained of the inadequate conditions of their detention and of the lack of any effective remedy in domestic law.
CASE OF KAYUN v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 48930/20 and 55051/20
The applicant complained of the inadequate conditions of his detention and of the lack of any effective remedy in domestic law.
CASE OF ATENTYEV AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 38264/20 and 11 others
The applicants complained of the inadequate conditions of their detention and of the lack of any effective remedy in domestic law. In applications nos. 38264/20 and 38269/20,