The applicants complained of the excessive length of their pre-trial detention. Some applicants also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention. FIFTH SECTION CASE OF SOROKOUMOV AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (Applications nos. 44584/13 and 4 others – see…
CASE OF GUSMERINI AND OTHERS v. ITALY (European Court of Human Rights) 50345/10 and 5 others
The applicants lodged claims with the national courts, contending that the INPS’s calculation methods were contrary to the spirit of the Italo-Swiss Convention. FIRST SECTION CASE OF GUSMERINI AND OTHERS v. ITALY (Applications nos. 50345/10 and 5 others – see…
CASE OF LACEJ AND OTHERS v. ALBANIA (European Court of Human Rights) 22122/08
The applicants complained in substance of the excessive length of civil proceedings, in particular those before the Supreme Court. THIRD SECTION CASE OF LACEJ AND OTHERS v. ALBANIA (Application no. 22122/08) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 29 September 2022 This judgment is final…
CASE OF KRYUK v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 52750/19 and 42931/20
The case originated in two applications against Ukraine lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”). FIFTH SECTION CASE OF KRYUK v. UKRAINE (Applications nos. 52750/19 and 42931/20)…
CASE OF ANASTASI AND OTHERS v. MALTA (European Court of Human Rights) 49102/19 and 2 others
The facts of this case are substantially the same as those described in Bartolo Parnis and Others v. Malta ((dec.), nos. 49378/18 and 3 others, 24 March 2020), in relation to the application of Act XVIII of 2007 introducing Article 12A into…
CASE OF KRYUK v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 43993/19 and 2 others
The applicant alleged that he did not receive adequate medical care in detention. He also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention. FIFTH SECTION CASE OF KRYUK v. UKRAINE (Applications nos. 43993/19 and 2 others – see appended…
CASE OF KATANOVIĆ AND MIHOVILOVIĆ v. CROATIA (European Court of Human Rights) 18208/19 and 12922/20
The applicants complained of the inadequate conditions of their detention. FIRST SECTION CASE OF KATANOVIĆ AND MIHOVILOVIĆ v. CROATIA (Applications nos. 18208/19 and 12922/20) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 29 September 2022 This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial…
CASE OF HRNČIĆ v. CROATIA (European Court of Human Rights) 53563/16
The applicant complained of the inadequate conditions of his detention. FIRST SECTION CASE OF HRNČIĆ v. CROATIA (Application no. 53563/16) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 29 September 2022 This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision. In the case…
CASE OF ALBÓK AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY (European Court of Human Rights) 49178/21 and 9 others
The applicants complained of the excessive length of their pre-trial detention. Some applicants also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention. FIRST SECTION CASE OF ALBÓK AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY (Applications nos. 49178/21 and 9 others – see…
CASE OF KOROL v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 15518/21
The case originated in an application against Ukraine lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on 9 March 2021. The applicant complained of the blanket ban on…