The applicant complained of the permanent video surveillance in a post-conviction detention facility. He also raised other complaints under Article 3 of the Convention.
CASE OF RIBEIRO DOS SANTOS AND JEVDOKIMOVS v. PORTUGAL (European Court of Human Rights) 28688/20 and 8655/21
The applicants complained of the inadequate conditions of their detention.
CASE OF KODELA v. HUNGARY (European Court of Human Rights) 30000/21 and 9 others
The applicants complained of the excessive length of criminal proceedings. Some applicants also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
CASE OF BALOGH AND OTHERS v. SLOVAKIA (European Court of Human Rights) 7918/19 and 43062/20
The case originated in applications against Slovakia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”)
CASE OF FROLOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 15394/19 and 2 others
The applicants complained of the excessive length of their pre-trial detention. Some applicants also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
CASE OF ABOS AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA (European Court of Human Rights) 36002/19 and 6 others
The applicants complained of the inadequate conditions of their detention.
CASE OF KATASONOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 48884/19 and 5 others
The applicants complained about deficiencies in proceedings for review of the lawfulness of detention. Some applicants also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
CASE OF BIRLOV AND RAKHMATULLAYEV v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 6652/20 and 30592/21
The applicants complained of the excessive length of their pre-trial detention. In application no. 30592/21, the applicant also raised another complaint under Article 5 § 4 of the Convention.
CASE OF KUZNETSOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights)
The applicants complained of the excessive length of their pre-trial detention. In applications nos. 43853/18 and 40991/19 the applicants also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
CASE OF VASETINSKIY AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 37436/18 and 5 others
The applicants complained of the excessive length of their pre-trial detention. Some applicants also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.