The case concerns the alleged failure to carry out an effective investigation into the applicant’s ill-treatment by private individuals, as well as the allegedly insufficient medical
CASE OF CRETU v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA (European Court of Human Rights) 24737/15
The present case concerns the applicant’s ill-treatment during his arrest and the failure to carry out an effective investigation into his allegations of ill-treatment.
CASE OF MANANNIKOV v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 9157/08
The case concerns the applicant’s conviction of an administrative offence for his failure to follow an order by the police to remove the banner which he displayed during a public event organised by others.
CASE OF KRAMAREVA v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 4418/18
THIRD SECTION CASE OF KRAMAREVA v. RUSSIA (Application no. 4418/18) JUDGMENT Art 6 § 1 (civil) • Fair balance between parties
Negovanović and Others v. Serbia
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 259 February 2022 Negovanović and Others v. Serbia – 29907/16, 30022/16, 30322/16 et al. Judgment 25.1.2022 [Section II]
CASE OF KOCAMIŞ AND KURT v. TURKEY (European Court of Human Rights) 227/13
The case concerns the alleged failure of the national courts to comply with certain procedural requirements under Article 5 § 4 of the Convention, particularly in relation to the right to an oral hearing
CASE OF NEGOVANOVIĆ AND OTHERS v. SERBIA (European Court of Human Rights) 29907/16 and 3 others
The applications concern alleged discrimination by the respondent State against blind chess players, its own nationals, who had won medals at major international events,
CASE OF GRESS v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 17573/14
The case concerns the applicant’s complaints under Article 5 §§ 1, 3 and 4 relating to his pre-trial detention and Article 6 § 1 and Article 13 of the Convention concerning the length of the criminal proceedings against him and lack
CASE OF OKSANICH v. UKRAINE – 64627/13. The case concerns the pre-trial detention of the applicant in excess of the maximum time-limit established by the domestic law
The case concerns the pre-trial detention of the applicant in excess of the maximum time-limit established by the domestic law, the absence of a thorough and speedy review of the lawfulness of his detention
CASE OF VYELYEV v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 57211/13
The case concerns the quashing of a final judgment delivered in the applicant’s favour. It raises issues under Article 6 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1.