The case concerns the applicant’s complaint, under Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (c) of the Convention, that in the criminal proceedings against him he was not invited to be present at the session of the appeal panel.
CASE OF SALMANOV v. SLOVAKIA (European Court of Human Rights) 40132/16
The application concerns the applicant’s detention on remand and the proceedings concerning his application for release in the context of his trial on the charge of bribery.
CASE OF MILANKOVIĆ v. CROATIA (European Court of Human Rights) 33351/20
The case concerns the applicant’s conviction, on the basis of his command responsibility, for war crimes against the Serbian civilian population and a prisoner of war, perpetrated in the territory of Croatia
CASE OF A.L. AND OTHERS v. NORWAY (European Court of Human Rights) 45889/18
The application concerns complaints under Articles 6 and 8 of the Convention relating to proceedings concerning childcare measures adopted in respect of the first and second applicants’ child, the third applicant, whose grandmother is the fourth applicant.
CASE OF E.M. AND OTHERS v. NORWAY (European Court of Human Rights) 53471/17
The case concerns a complaint under Article 8 of the Convention in relation to proceedings in which it was decided not to lift a care order in respect of the first applicant’s two children, the second and third applicants;
CASE OF EDZGVERADZE v. GEORGIA (European Court of Human Rights) 59333/16
The case primarily concerns the applicant’s complaint under Article 2 of the Convention that no effective investigation was carried out into her husband’s suicide which had taken place the day following his questioning by the police
CASE OF LUKOŠIN v. LITHUANIA (European Court of Human Rights) 25059/20
The application concerns alleged inadequate conditions of the applicant’s detention.
Atristain Gorosabel v. Spain (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 258 January 2022 Atristain Gorosabel v. Spain – 15508/15 Judgment 18.1.2022 [Section III]
Faysal Pamuk v. Turkey (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 258 January 2022 Faysal Pamuk v. Turkey – 430/13 Judgment 18.1.2022 [Section II]
CASE OF MELEGA v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA (European Court of Human Rights) 40427/18
The case concerns the reversal of a judgment of a first instance court by which the applicant was acquitted and his conviction on appeal without examining anew any evidence or hearing witnesses.