The application mainly concerns the alleged unfairness of criminal proceedings owing to the alleged failure of the domestic courts to examine the applicant’s challenges to the evidence in a manner compliant with the principle of equality
CASE OF KOMAROMI AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA (European Court of Human Rights) 30075/03 and 23 others
FOURTH SECTION CASE OF KOMAROMI AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA (Applications nos. 30075/03 and 23 others) JUDGMENT (Revision) STRASBOURG 18 January 2022
CASE OF LYUBOV VASILYEVA v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 62080/09
The present case concerns the death of the applicant’s son during his compulsory military service and the subsequent investigation.
CASE OF NEVZLIN v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 26679/08
The present case concerns the applicant’s complaints under Article 6 § 3 of the Convention that his trial in absentia was unfair. The main issues are whether his defence had adequate time and facilities for preparation
CASE OF RADMILLI v. MALTA (European Court of Human Rights) 28711/19
Act XXIII of 1979 amending Chapter 158 of the Laws of Malta – Overview of the Case-law of the ECHR FIRST SECTION CASE OF RADMILLI v. MALTA (Application no. 28711/19) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 13 January 2022
CASE OF BORODAY AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 44274/13 and 2 others
The applicants alleged that they did not receive adequate medical care in detention. Some applicants also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
CASE OF PÓCZA AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY (European Court of Human Rights) 13353/21
The applicants complained of the excessive length of civil proceedings. FIRST SECTION CASE OF PÓCZA AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY (Application no. 13353/21)
CASE OF MARTYNYUK AND KOZMINA v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 9493/21 and 18048/21
The applicants complained of the excessive length of civil proceedings and of the lack of any effective remedy in domestic law.
CASE OF RONTÓNÉ SZÉP AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY (European Court of Human Rights) 390/21
The applicants complained of the excessive length of civil proceedings. FIRST SECTION CASE OF RONTÓNÉ SZÉP AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY
CASE OF ECKERMANN v. HUNGARY (European Court of Human Rights) 52090/20 and 4 others
The applicants complained of the excessive length of civil proceedings. Some applicants also raised other complaints under Article 13 of the Convention.