The applicants complained of the inadequate conditions of their detention. FOURTH SECTION CASE OF DUMITRACHE AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA (Application no. 58771/16 and 9 others – see appended list) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 2 December 2021 This judgment is final but it…
CASE OF IANCU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 57085/16 and 12 others
The applicants complained of the inadequate conditions of their detention. FOURTH SECTION CASE OF IANCU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA (Application no. 57085/16 and 12 others – see appended list) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 2 December 2021 This judgment is final but it…
CASE OF COVACI AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 48624/16 and 11 others
The applicants complained of the inadequate conditions of their detention. FOURTH SECTION CASE OF COVACI AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA (Application no. 48624/16 and 11 others – see appended list) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 2 December 2021 This judgment is final but it…
CASE OF DICU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 30319/16 and 14 others
The applicants complained of the inadequate conditions of their detention. FOURTH SECTION CASE OF DICU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA (Application no. 30319/16 and 14 others – see appended list) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 2 December 2021 This judgment is final but it…
CASE OF SZÉL AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY – The applicants complained that the measure taken by the Speaker of banning the first applicant’s parliamentary speech had infringed the applicants’ right to freedom of expression
Relying in particular on Article 10 (freedom of expression) and Article 13 (right to an effective remedy), the applicants complained that the measure taken by the Speaker of banning the first applicant’s parliamentary speech had infringed the applicants’ right to freedom…
CASE OF SCOTT BADER D.O.O. AND MILETIC v. CROATIA – The case mainly concerns the deprivation of property arising from a government decision on the restructuring and recovery of a commercial bank depriving its shareholders of their shares
The case mainly concerns the deprivation of property arising from a government decision on the restructuring and recovery of a commercial bank depriving its shareholders, including the applicants, of their shares, and the lack of access to a court in…
CASE OF GROMOVOY AND SHAYDULLOV v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 24857/15 and 36001/20
The applicants complained of the permanent video surveillance of detainees in pre-trial or post-conviction detention facilities and about unavailability of an effective remedy in this respect. THIRD SECTION CASE OF GROMOVOY AND SHAYDULLOV v. RUSSIA (Applications nos. 24857/15 and 36001/20)…
CASE OF MALYGIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA – The applicants complained of the permanent video surveillance of detainees in pre-trial or post-conviction detention facilities. They also complained about poor conditions of transport
The applicants complained of the permanent video surveillance of detainees in pre-trial or post-conviction detention facilities. They also complained about poor conditions of transport and raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention. THIRD SECTION CASE OF MALYGIN AND…
CASE OF YEVDOKIMOV v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 42787/11
The applicant complained of deficiencies in proceedings for review of the lawfulness of his detention. He also raised complaints under other provisions of the Convention. THIRD SECTION CASE OF YEVDOKIMOV v. RUSSIA (Application no. 42787/11) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 2 December 2021…
CASE OF GOROZHANKIN AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 13582/11 and 2 others
The applicants complained of the unlawful detention. FIFTH SECTION CASE OF GOROZHANKIN AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (Applications nos. 13582/11 and 2 others – see appended list) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 2 December 2021 This judgment is final but it may be subject…