The present case concerns the removal of the third applicant from the care of his grandparents, with whom he spent his first five years, to that of his biological father,
CASE OF MIRONESCU v. ROMANIA (European Court of Human Rights) 17504/18
The application concerns the applicant’s inability to vote in legislative elections, despite his right not being restricted by court order, for the sole reason that, on the date of the elections,
CASE OF ȚIRIAC v. ROMANIA – The applicant complained about a breach of his right to honour and reputation, alleging that the domestic courts had failed to protect his rights following an allegedly defamatory press article
FOURTH SECTION CASE OF ȚIRIAC v. ROMANIA (Application no. 51107/16) JUDGMENT
CASE OF AVCI v. DENMARK – The application concerns the order for the expulsion of a settled migrant, issued in criminal proceedings
SECOND SECTION CASE OF AVCI v. DENMARK (Application no. 40240/19) JUDGMENT
CASE OF GENOV AND SARBINSKA v. BULGARIA – The two applicants, a popular blogger and a political activist, were found guilty of hooliganism and fined for spray-painting a monument to “partisans” on the anniversary of the 1917 Bolshevik Revolution
The two applicants, a popular blogger and a political activist, were found guilty of hooliganism and fined for spray-painting a monument to “partisans” on the anniversary of the 1917 Bolshevik Revolution,
CASE OF DERENIK MKRTCHYAN AND GAYANE MKRTCHYAN v. ARMENIA (European Court of Human Rights) 69736/12
The applicants are the grandfather and the mother of Derenik G., who died following a fight at a State school. The applicants complained, under Article 2 of the Convention,
Biancardi v. Italy (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 256 November 2021 Biancardi v. Italy – 77419/16 Judgment 25.11.2021 [Section I]
CASE OF SEVASTYANOV v. UKRAINE – The case concerns the applicant’s allegations of ill-treatment while in police custody, his unlawful and excessive pre-trial detention as well as the excessive length of criminal proceedings
The case concerns the applicant’s allegations of ill-treatment while in police custody (Article 3), his unlawful and excessive pre-trial detention (Article 5 §§ 1 and 3)
CASE OF EKA MIKELADZE AND OTHERS v. GEORGIA – The applications concern, under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1, the alleged unlawfulness of the revocation of the applicants’ property rights over plots of land.
FIFTH SECTION CASE OF EKA MIKELADZE AND OTHERS v. GEORGIA (Applications nos. 29385/11 and 3 others) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 25 November 2021
CASE OF TSENTR “UKRASA” v. UKRAINE – The present application concerns the issue of res judicata. The applicant company complained under Article 6 of the Convention that the national courts had considered the same claim involving the same parties twice.
FIFTH SECTION CASE OF TSENTR “UKRASA” v. UKRAINE (Application no. 2836/10) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 25 November 2021