The applicants complained that the delay in the registration and the subsequent dissolution of the Election Monitoring Centre had violated their right to freedom of association under Article 11 of the Convention and that the seizure of their case file from…
CASE OF JALLOW v. NORWAY – The applicant sought to be granted parental responsibilities for his child of whom he had never had custody, after the child’s mother had died
The case concerns complaints lodged with the Court under Articles 6 and 8 of the Convention relating to proceedings through which the applicant sought to be granted parental responsibilities for his child of whom he had never had custody, after…
Derenik Mkrtchyan and Gayane Mkrtchyan v. Armenia (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 256 November 2021 Derenik Mkrtchyan and Gayane Mkrtchyan v. Armenia – 69736/12 Judgment 30.11.2021 [Section IV] Article 2 Positive obligations Article 2-1 Life State school, unaware of pupil’s health vulnerability, not responsible for his…
Mironescu v. Romania (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 256 November 2021 Mironescu v. Romania – 17504/18 Judgment 30.11.2021 [Section IV] Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 Vote Unjustified restriction on voting rights of applicant serving prison sentence outside the electoral constituency of…
Genov and Sarbinska v. Bulgaria (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 256 November 2021 Genov and Sarbinska v. Bulgaria – 52358/15 Judgment 30.11.2021 [Section IV] Article 10 Article 10-1 Freedom of expression Unjustified conviction and fine for spray-painting a monument connected to communist regime in…
CASE OF MĂTĂSARU v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA – This case concerns the applicant’s arrest and detention for three days followed by his conviction for organising a one person protest in front of the Anticorruption Prosecutor’s Office involving a toilet seat and simulation of using it
SECOND SECTION CASE OF MĂTĂSARU v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA (Application no. 53098/17) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 30 November 2021 This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Mătăsaru v. the Republic of Moldova,…
CASE OF A.C. v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA – The case concerns the adequacy of medical care in detention and the hindrance of the applicant’s right of individual application
SECOND SECTION CASE OF A.C. v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA (Application no. 60450/13) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 30 November 2021 This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of A.C. v. the Republic of Moldova,…
CASE OF X v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA – The application concerns the alleged breach of the applicant’s right to respect for his privacy, as a result of the inclusion of information about his past convictions in criminal record certificates
SECOND SECTION CASE OF X v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA (Application no. 43529/13) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 30 November 2021 This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of X v. the Republic of Moldova,…
CASE OF COLIBAN v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA – The case concerns the applicant’s detention and conviction for distributing electoral leaflets in the self-proclaimed “Moldovan Republic of Transdniestria”
The case concerns the applicant’s detention and conviction for distributing electoral leaflets in the self-proclaimed “Moldovan Republic of Transdniestria” (the “MRT” – see for more details Ilașcu and Others v. Moldova and Russia [GC], no. 48787/99, §§ 28-185, ECHR 2004-II)). He…
CASE OF GOLUB v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA – The case is about the applicant’s compulsory military service in the self-proclaimed “Moldovan Republic of Transdniestria”
The case is about the applicant’s compulsory military service in the self-proclaimed “Moldovan Republic of Transdniestria” (the “MRT” – see for more details Ilașcu and Others v. Moldova and Russia [GC], no. 48787/99, §§ 28-185, ECHR 2004-II). He complains that his…