The application concerns the delayed provision of compensation to the applicant for his property which was expropriated for urban development in 1983 by the municipal authorities of Dobrich.
CASE OF GANCHEVI v. BULGARIA (European Court of Human Rights) 40026/19
The application concerns the delayed provision of compensation to the applicants for their predecessors’ property which was expropriated for urban development in 1983 by the municipal authorities of Dobrich.
CASE OF K.K. AND OTHERS v. DENMARK (European Court of Human Rights) 25212/21
Before the Court, the applicants complained that the authorities’ refusal, upheld by the Supreme Court on 6 November 2020, to let the first applicant adopt the second and third applicants, twins born through surrogacy,
CASE OF KALDA v. ESTONIA (No. 2) (European Court of Human Rights) 14581/20
The case concerns the statutory ban on persons who have been convicted of a crime and who are serving their prison sentence from voting in the European Parliament elections.
CASE OF SUBAŞI AND OTHERS v. TÜRKİYE (European Court of Human Rights) 3468/20 and 18 others
The applications concern the refusal of the domestic authorities to grant the applicants, who were detained at the time of the events, permission to receive visits from their school-age children during the weekends.
CASE OF PANNON PLAKÁT KFT AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY (European Court of Human Rights) 39859/14
The case concerns the alleged interference with the applicant companies’ rights under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention and Article 10 of the Convention as a result of a series of legislative amendments which
CASE OF MNATSAKANYAN v. ARMENIA (European Court of Human Rights) 2463/12
The case concerns the applicant’s alleged inability to have recourse to judicial review of the decision to recommend his dismissal from the office of a judge. The applicant further considered that his dismissal had violated his right to freedom
CASE OF KERIMOĞLU v. TÜRKIYE (European Court of Human Rights) 58829/10
The application concerns the alleged unfairness of criminal proceedings that resulted in the applicant’s conviction and his having to serve approximately eight years and seven months in prison owing to the domestic courts’ failure to state
A.D. and Others v. Georgia (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law November 2022 A.D. and Others v. Georgia – 57864/17, 79087/17 and 55353/19 Judgment 1.12.2022 [Section V] Article 8 Positive obligations Article 8-1 Respect for private life
CASE OF KASHIN AND PETKYAVICHUS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 15007/19 and 17123/19
The applicants complained of the inadequate conditions of detention during their transport.