FIFTH SECTION CASE OF GERASHCHENKO AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (Applications nos. 9219/20 and 3 others – see appended list) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 16 September 2021
CASE OF KOCHURA AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) Applications nos. 7925/20 and 9 others ‑ see appended list
FIFTH SECTION CASE OF KOCHURA AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (Applications nos. 7925/20 and 9 others ‑ see appended list) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 16 September 2021
CASE OF YERYOMENKO AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 59600/19 and 2 others – see appended list
FIFTH SECTION CASE OF YERYOMENKO AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (Application no. 59600/19 and 2 others – see appended list) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 16 September 2021
CASE OF POLISHCHUK AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) Applications nos. 6648/14 and 3 others – see appended table
The applicants alleged, in particular, under Article 3 of the Convention that they had been ill-treated by the police and that the investigation into their respective complaints was ineffective.
CASE OF LUTAYENKO AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) Applications nos. 1781/14 and 4 others – see appended table
The applicants alleged, in particular, under Article 3 of the Convention, that they had been ill-treated by the police and that the investigation into their respective complaints had been ineffective.
CASE OF ALIZADA AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) Applications nos. 1100/14 and 2 others – see appended table
The applicants alleged, in particular, under Article 3 of the Convention that they had been ill-treated by the police. Two applicants (applications nos. 1100/14 and 71568/14)
CASE OF MAKARENKO AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) Applications nos. 53747/09 and 4 others – see appended table
The applicants alleged, in particular, under Article 3 of the Convention, that they had been ill-treated by the police and that the investigation into their respective complaints was ineffective.
CASE OF X v. POLAND (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 20741/10
The applicant alleged that she had been discriminated against on the basis of her sexual orientation in proceedings for full parental rights and custody rights over her youngest child. PDF, WORD.
Resolution CM/ResChS(2015)4: European Federation of National Organisations working with the Homeless (FEANTSA) v. the Netherlands, Complaint No. 86/2012
Resolution CM/ResChS(2015)4 European Federation of National Organisations working with the Homeless (FEANTSA) v. the Netherlands, Complaint No. 86/2012
3d assessment of follow-up: European Federation of National Organisations Working with the Homeless (FEANTSA) v. the Netherlands, Complaint No. 86/2012, decision on the merits of 2 July 2014, Resolution ResChS(2015)4
3d assessment of follow-up: European Federation of National Organisations Working with the Homeless (FEANTSA) v. the Netherlands, Complaint No. 86/2012,