INTRODUCTION. Failure to ensure expeditious proceedings in respect of international parental child abduction.
CASE OF SEDLETSKA v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 42634/18
INTRODUCTION. The present case concerns complaints raised under Articles 10 and 13 of the Convention of interference with the protection of journalistic sources as a result of judicial
CASE OF M.B. AND OTHERS v. SLOVAKIA (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 45322/17
INTRODUCTION. The present application originates specifically from an incident that is alleged to have taken place in the police car after the applicants’ arrest.
Di Martino and Molinari v. Italy (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 249 March 2021 Di Martino and Molinari v. Italy – 15931/15 and 16459/15 Judgment 25.3.2021 [Section I]
Smiljanić v. Croatia (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 249 March 2021 Smiljanić v. Croatia – 35983/14 Judgment 25.3.2021 [Section I]
Stoimenovikj and Miloshevikj v. North Macedonia (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 249 March 2021 Stoimenovikj and Miloshevikj v. North Macedonia – 59842/14 Judgment 25.3.2021 [Section V]
Bivolaru and Moldovan v. France (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 249 March 2021 Bivolaru and Moldovan v. France – 40324/16 and 12623/17 Judgment 25.3.2021 [Section V]
CASE OF AVRAIMOV v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 71818/17
INTRODUCTION. The case concerns the applicant’s complaints that the physical conditions of his detention in the Kyiv pre-trial detention centre were in breach of Article 3 of the Convention and that the Code of Criminal
CASE OF ALEKSANDROVSKAYA v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 38718/16
INTRODUCTION. The case concerns the applicant’s complaints: under Article 3 of the Convention that she was placed in metal cages during court hearings; under Article 5 § 1 (c) that her arrest was unlawful;
CASE OF VALENTYN IVANOV v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 9021/11
INTRODUCTION. The present case concerns a failure of the national courts to address a specific and pertinent argument which was important to the outcome of the applicant’s case concerning the allocation of the