The case originated in applications against Hungary lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”).
CASE OF GUROV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA – 5123/09 and 2 others. The applicants complained of the secret surveillance in the context of criminal proceedings
The case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various dates indicated in the appended table.
CASE OF POPOV v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 17730/08
The case originated in an application against Russia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on 4 April 2008.
CASE OF MESIĆ v. CROATIA (European Court of Human Rights) 19362/18
The case concerns civil proceedings for defamation in which the applicant – a former President of Croatia – was ordered to pay 50,000 Croatian kunas (HRK; approximately 6,660 euros (EUR) at the material time)
CASE OF LIA v. MALTA (European Court of Human Rights) 8709/20
The case concerns the decision to refuse the applicants’ request for a self-funded, second cycle of Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection (an in vitro fertilisation procedure), using the applicants’ gametes,
CASE OF VLAHOV v. CROATIA (European Court of Human Rights) 31163/13
The case mainly concerns the applicant’s complaint under Article 11 of the Convention about his criminal conviction for refusing to admit several individuals to a trade union whilst acting in his capacity as a trade union representative.
Volodya Avetisyan v. Armenia (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 262 May 2022 Volodya Avetisyan v. Armenia – 39087/15 Judgment 3.5.2022 [Section IV]
Bumbeș v. Romania (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 262 May 2022 Bumbeș v. Romania – 18079/15 Judgment 3.5.2022 [Section IV]
CASE OF EREN AND OTHERS v. TURKEY (European Court of Human Rights) 29936/19 and 7 others
The applications concern the non-enforcement of domestic courts’ decisions despite the Compensation Commission’s findings of breach of the applicants’ right to a fair trial.
CASE OF DIMOV v. BULGARIA (European Court of Human Rights) 14642/15
The case concerns the restitution of agricultural land. The applicant complained under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1, Article 6 § 1 and Article 13 of the Convention that the restitution procedure had not been completed for many years, without…