The case concerns delayed enforcement of a decision awarding the applicant a certain property he bought at a public auction in the enforcement proceedings against third persons.
CASE OF PANCHENKO AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) Applications nos. 66179/14 and 3 others – see appended table
All the cases concern the applicants’ placement in prisons far from their families and the repeated rejections of their requests for a transfer to a closer prison
CASE OF BOZHENKO v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 42595/14
The applicant complained of ineffective investigation into the death of her husband, who had died in a traffic accident.
CASE OF FESHCHENKO v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 75394/13
The present case concerns allegations under Article 2 of the Convention that the investigation into the disappearance of the applicant’s daughter was ineffective.
CASE OF SALAMEH v. CROATIA (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 38943/15
The applicant complained of the excessive length of two sets of concurrent civil proceedings he had instituted before the Zagreb Municipal Labour Court.
CASE OF KADALA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) Applications nos. 62276/16 and 11 others – see appended list
The applicants complained of the non-enforcement or delayed enforcement of domestic decisions and of the lack of any effective remedy in domestic law.
CASE OF BALDACCHINO AND FALZON v. MALTA (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 30806/19
The present application concerns a breach of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention in relation to the disproportionate amount of rent received by the applicants,
CASE OF BARANYI AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY (European Court of Human Rights) Applications nos. 45540/20 and 5 others – see appended list
The applicants complained of the excessive length of their pre-trial detention. In application no. 1552/21, the applicant also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
CASE OF BUTOV AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) Applications nos. 44272/20 and 6 others – see appended list
The applicants complained about inadequate conditions of their detention and lack of any effective remedy in domestic law.
CASE OF BESIROVIC AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY (European Court of Human Rights) Applications nos. 35503/20 and 5 others – see appended list
The applicants complained of the excessive length of criminal proceedings. The applicants also raised other complaints under Article 13 of the Convention.