The application concerns the threatened expulsion of the applicants and their four children to Iraq and the alleged failure of both the administrative authorities and the courts to conduct a proper assessment of the applicants’ allegation that they would be…
CASE OF PANTENKOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA – 884/22 and 17 others
The applicants complained of the disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies. European Court of Human Rights SECOND SECTION CASE OF PANTENKOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (Applications nos. 884/22 and 17 others – see appended…
CASE OF PETROVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
The applicants complained of the disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies. European Court of Human Rights SECOND SECTION CASE OF PETROVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (Applications nos. 55480/21 and 38 others – see appended…
CASE OF USTINOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA – 51373/21 and 35 others
The applicants complained of the disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies. European Court of Human Rights SECOND SECTION CASE OF USTINOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (Applications nos. 51373/21 and 35 others – see appended…
CASE OF BUTYANOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA – 36904/19 and 37 others
The applicants complained of the deficiencies in proceedings for review of the lawfulness of detention. European Court of Human Rights SECOND SECTION CASE OF BUTYANOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (Applications nos. 36904/19 and 37 others – see appended list) JUDGMENT…
CASE OF MIKHAYLOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA – 27315/19 and 50 others
The applicants complained about their confinement in a metal cage in the courtroom during the criminal proceedings against them. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the applicants’ confinement in a…
CASE OF DZUNDZA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
The applicants complained about their confinement in a metal cage in the courtroom during the criminal proceedings against them. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the applicants’ confinement in a…
CASE OF SARDAR BABAYEV v. AZERBAIJAN – The present two applications concern the pre-trial detention and subsequent criminal conviction of the applicant, a local clergyman who obtained his religious education abroad, for preaching and conducting Friday prayers in a mosque
European Court of Human Rights (Application no. 34015/17 and 26896/18) The applicant maintained his complaint, submitting that his criminal conviction for preaching and conducting Friday prayers in a mosque had amounted to an unjustified interference with his right to manifest…
CASE OF SARDAR BABAYEV v. AZERBAIJAN – 34015/17 and 26896/18
The present two applications concern the pre-trial detention and subsequent criminal conviction of the applicant, a local clergyman who obtained his religious education abroad, for preaching and conducting Friday prayers in a mosque. As a result, the interference with the…
CASE OF UGULAVA v. GEORGIA (No. 2) – The case concerns the applicant’s allegation under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention that the Criminal Chamber of the Supreme Court, which examined his case in domestic proceedings, was not an “independent and impartial tribunal established by law”
European Court of Human Rights (22431/20) The applicant was one of the leaders of the United National Movement (“the UNM”), a political party which governed the country between November 2003 and October 2012. He was initially appointed mayor of Tbilisi…