The present case concerns alleged restrictions imposed by the authorities on the exercise of the applicants’ freedom of peaceful assembly and the alleged lack of domestic remedies in that regard. The European Court of Human Rights reiterates that since overcrowding…
CASE OF LAURIJSEN AND OTHERS v. THE NETHERLANDS – The case concerns a protest against a preannounced eviction of a squatted building
The case concerns a protest against a preannounced eviction of a squatted building. The applicants argue that they had no violent intentions and that their arrest, prosecution and conviction amounted to an unjustified interference with their right to freedom of…
G.T.B. v. Spain
Legal summary November 2023 G.T.B. v. Spain – 3041/19 Judgment 16.11.2023 [Section V] Article 8 Positive obligations Article 8-1 Respect for private life
CASE OF NAGY v. HUNGARY – The applicant complained of the excessive length of his pre-trial detention
Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion on the admissibility and merits of these complaints. Having regard to its case-law on…
CASE OF TITARCHUK v. UKRAINE – The applicant complained of the inadequate conditions of his detention and of the lack of any effective remedy in domestic law
Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion on the admissibility and merits of these complaints. Having regard to its case-law on…
CASE OF MALAKHOV AND KRAYNYUCHENKO v. UKRAINE – The applicants complained of the inadequate conditions of their detention and of the lack of any effective remedy in domestic law
Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion on the admissibility and merits of these complaints. Having regard to its case-law on…
CASE OF OLIYNYK AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE – The applicants complained of the inadequate conditions of their detention and that they had no effective remedy in this connection
Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion on the admissibility and merits of these complaints. Having regard to its case-law on…
CASE OF BELLOTTO AND OTHERS v. ITALY – The applicants complained of the retrospective application of section 1(218) of Law no. 266/2005 of 23 December 2005 to pending proceedings
As regards Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, the European Court of Human Rights finds that in the circumstances of the present case section 1(218) of Law no. 266/2005 of 23 December 2005 resolved the merits of the dispute…
CASE OF SHCHURKO AND OTRYSHKO v. UKRAINE – The applicants alleged that they did not receive adequate medical care in detention
Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has identified the shortcomings in the applicants’ medical treatment, which are listed in the appended table. The Court has already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those…
CASE OF SADIO v. ITALY – The case concerns the poor conditions of the applicant’s accommodations in the reception centre in Cona (Venice)
The applicant complained that his reception conditions in Cona had been poor. He alleged that the centre had been overcrowded and that there had been a lack of basic facilities, such as proper heating and hot water, and a lack…