The applicants complained principally of disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies, namely their arrest in relation to the dispersal of these assemblies and their conviction for administrative offences. They relied, expressly or in substance,…
CASE OF MAHMUDOV v. AZERBAIJAN – 50612/18. The case concerns a travel ban imposed on the applicant, an independent journalist
The case concerns a travel ban imposed on the applicant, an independent journalist, in the absence of any judicial decision in that regard, and his allegedly unlawful arrest and detention. On 22 June 2017 when attempting to cross the border…
CASE OF SAFRONOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA – The applicants complained of the inadequate conditions of detention under strict imprisonment regime
The applicants complained principally of the inadequate conditions of detention under strict imprisonment regime. They relied, expressly or in substance, on Article 3 of the Convention. Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any…
CASE OF KIRPICHEV (KIRPICHENKO) AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA – The applicants complained of the disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies
The applicants complained principally of disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies, namely their arrest in relation to the dispersal of these assemblies and their conviction for administrative offences. They relied, expressly or in substance,…
CASE OF VARACHENKOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA – The applicants complained of the disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies
The applicants complained principally of disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers and participants of public assemblies, namely the dispersal of these assemblies, as well as their arrest followed by their conviction for administrative offences. They relied, expressly or in…
CASE OF BOCHAROV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA – The applicants complained of the inadequate conditions of their detention
The applicants complained principally of the inadequate conditions of their detention. They relied on Article 3 of the Convention. Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it…
CASE OF KAPITONOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA – The applicants complained of the disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies
The applicants complained principally of disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies, namely their arrest in relation to the dispersal of these assemblies and their conviction for administrative offences. They relied, expressly or in substance,…
CASE OF MAZUROVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (984/15 and 23 others) The applicants complained of the disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies
The applicants complained principally of disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies, namely their arrest in relation to the dispersal of these assemblies and their conviction for administrative offences. They relied, expressly or in substance,…
CASE OF LANG v. UKRAINE – 49134/20. The case concerns the decision to extradite the applicant to the United States of America
The applicant, who has US nationality, complained that his extradition would violate Article 3 of the Convention because, if convicted on the charges against him, he would risk receiving an irreducible sentence of life imprisonment. The Court concludes that the…
Durdaj and Others v. Albania
Legal summary November 2023 Durdaj and Others v. Albania – 63543/09, 46707/13, 46714/13 et al. Judgment 7.11.2023 [Section III] Article 2 Article 2-1 Effective investigation Effectiveness of investigation and ensuing criminal proceedings into explosion at Gërdec weapon decommissioning facility resulting…