The applicants complained principally of disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies, namely their arrest in relation to the dispersal of these assemblies and their conviction for administrative offences. They relied, expressly or in substance,…
CASE OF VARACHENKOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA – The applicants complained of the disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies
The applicants complained principally of disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers and participants of public assemblies, namely the dispersal of these assemblies, as well as their arrest followed by their conviction for administrative offences. They relied, expressly or in…
CASE OF BOCHAROV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA – The applicants complained of the inadequate conditions of their detention
The applicants complained principally of the inadequate conditions of their detention. They relied on Article 3 of the Convention. Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it…
CASE OF KAPITONOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA – The applicants complained of the disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies
The applicants complained principally of disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies, namely their arrest in relation to the dispersal of these assemblies and their conviction for administrative offences. They relied, expressly or in substance,…
CASE OF MAZUROVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (984/15 and 23 others) The applicants complained of the disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies
The applicants complained principally of disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies, namely their arrest in relation to the dispersal of these assemblies and their conviction for administrative offences. They relied, expressly or in substance,…
CASE OF LANG v. UKRAINE – 49134/20. The case concerns the decision to extradite the applicant to the United States of America
The applicant, who has US nationality, complained that his extradition would violate Article 3 of the Convention because, if convicted on the charges against him, he would risk receiving an irreducible sentence of life imprisonment. The Court concludes that the…
Durdaj and Others v. Albania
Legal summary November 2023 Durdaj and Others v. Albania – 63543/09, 46707/13, 46714/13 et al. Judgment 7.11.2023 [Section III] Article 2 Article 2-1 Effective investigation
CASE OF DURDAJ AND OTHERS v. ALBANIA – 63543/09 and 3 others. The application concerns the explosion at the Gërdec facility for dismantling decommissioned and obsolete weapons
The application concerns the explosion at the Gërdec facility for dismantling decommissioned and obsolete weapons, machinery and equipment of the armed forces which resulted in the death of the applicants’ next of kin or grievous bodily injuries to the applicants.…
CASE OF KASHUBA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA. The applicants complained about their confinement in a metal cage and/or a glass cabin in the courtroom during the criminal proceedings against them
Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant cases the applicants’ confinement in a metal cage and/or a glass cabin before the court during the criminal proceedings against them amounted to degrading treatment.…
CASE OF VINOKUROV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA – 32706/15 and 49 others
The applicants complained about their confinement in a metal cage in a courtroom during criminal proceedings against them.