Under Article 8 and in substance also under Article 9 of the Convention, the applicants complained that the domestic courts had refused to return their two youngest children, R. and M.,
CASE OF OVCHARENKO AND KOLOS v. UKRAINE – 27276/15 and 33692/15. The present case concerns the dismissal of two judges of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine
FIFTH SECTION CASE OF OVCHARENKO AND KOLOS v. UKRAINE (Applications nos. 27276/15 and 33692/15) JUDGMENT
CASE OF PARIZEK v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC (European Court of Human Rights) 76286/14
The application concerns complaints mainly under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention and Article 6 § 1 of the Convention in respect of an increase in the amount of rent
CASE OF SVIRGUNETS v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 38262/10
FIFTH SECTION CASE OF SVIRGUNETS v. UKRAINE (Application no. 38262/10) JUDGMENT (Just satisfaction) STRASBOURG 20 December 2022
CASE OF S.H. v. MALTA (European Court of Human Rights) 37241/21
The application concerns the procedure leading to the refusal of the applicant’s asylum requests and the alleged violation of Article 13 in conjunction with Article 3 of the Convention and Article 3 taken alone.
CASE OF BAKOYANNI v. GREECE (European Court of Human Rights) 31012/19
The case concerns the refusal of the Greek Parliament to lift immunity of P.K. (who was, at the relevant time, the Minister of Defence) for defamation allegedly committed against the applicant,
The application concerns the inability of female civil servants who had attained the retirement age set for women to continue to work until they reached the retirement age set for men
FOURTH SECTION CASE OF MORARU AND MARIN v. ROMANIA (Applications nos. 53282/18 and 31428/20) JUDGMENT
CASE OF AZMATGIRIYEV AND MENKOV v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 26683/18 and 9122/19
The applicants complained of the permanent video surveillance of detainees in post-conviction detention facilities.
CASE OF PIATKOWSKI v. POLAND (European Court of Human Rights) 18590/18
The applicant complained of the excessive length of civil proceedings and of the lack of any effective remedy in domestic law.
CASE OF BEREZA v. POLAND (European Court of Human Rights) 16988/18
The applicant complained of the excessive length of criminal proceedings and of the lack of any effective remedy in domestic law.