The case concerns the applicant’s force-feeding in prison and raises issues under Article 3 of the Convention.
Subaşı v. Türkiye (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law December 2022 Subaşı v. Türkiye – 3468/20, 5898/20, 7270/20 et al. Judgment 6.12.2022 [Section II] Article 8 Positive obligations Article 8-1 Respect for correspondence Respect for family life
Kalda v. Estonia (No. 2) (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law December 2022 Kalda v. Estonia (No. 2) – 14581/20 Judgment 6.12.2022 [Section III] Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 Vote
K.K. and Others v. Denmark (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law December 2022 K.K. and Others v. Denmark – 25212/21 Judgment 6.12.2022 [Section II] Article 8 Article 8-1 Respect for family life Respect for private life
Pannon Plakát Kft and Others v. Hungary (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law December 2022 Pannon Plakát Kft and Others v. Hungary – 39859/14 Judgment 6.12.2022 [Section I] Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 Article 1 para. 2 of Protocol No. 1 Control of the use of…
Scalzo v. Italy – 8790/21 (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law December 2022 Scalzo v. Italy – 8790/21 Judgment 6.12.2022 [Section I] Article 8 Positive obligations
CASE OF STOYANOVA v. BULGARIA (European Court of Human Rights) 40101/19
The application concerns the delayed provision of compensation to the applicant for her parents’ property which was expropriated for urban development in 1985 by the municipal authorities of Dobrich.
CASE OF HALIL v. BULGARIA (European Court of Human Rights) 40029/19
The application concerns the delayed provision of compensation to the applicant for his property which was expropriated for urban development in 1983 by the municipal authorities of Dobrich.
CASE OF GANCHEVI v. BULGARIA (European Court of Human Rights) 40026/19
The application concerns the delayed provision of compensation to the applicants for their predecessors’ property which was expropriated for urban development in 1983 by the municipal authorities of Dobrich.
CASE OF K.K. AND OTHERS v. DENMARK (European Court of Human Rights) 25212/21
Before the Court, the applicants complained that the authorities’ refusal, upheld by the Supreme Court on 6 November 2020, to let the first applicant adopt the second and third applicants, twins born through surrogacy,