The case concerns the statutory ban on persons who have been convicted of a crime and who are serving their prison sentence from voting in the European Parliament elections.
CASE OF SUBAŞI AND OTHERS v. TÜRKİYE (European Court of Human Rights) 3468/20 and 18 others
The applications concern the refusal of the domestic authorities to grant the applicants, who were detained at the time of the events, permission to receive visits from their school-age children during the weekends.
CASE OF PANNON PLAKÁT KFT AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY (European Court of Human Rights) 39859/14
The case concerns the alleged interference with the applicant companies’ rights under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention and Article 10 of the Convention as a result of a series of legislative amendments which
CASE OF MNATSAKANYAN v. ARMENIA (European Court of Human Rights) 2463/12
The case concerns the applicant’s alleged inability to have recourse to judicial review of the decision to recommend his dismissal from the office of a judge. The applicant further considered that his dismissal had violated his right to freedom
CASE OF KERIMOĞLU v. TÜRKIYE (European Court of Human Rights) 58829/10
The application concerns the alleged unfairness of criminal proceedings that resulted in the applicant’s conviction and his having to serve approximately eight years and seven months in prison owing to the domestic courts’ failure to state
A.D. and Others v. Georgia (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law November 2022 A.D. and Others v. Georgia – 57864/17, 79087/17 and 55353/19 Judgment 1.12.2022 [Section V] Article 8 Positive obligations Article 8-1 Respect for private life
CASE OF KASHIN AND PETKYAVICHUS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 15007/19 and 17123/19
The applicants complained of the inadequate conditions of detention during their transport.
CASE OF ZHUKOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 41323/18 and 2 others
The applicants complained about theirconfinement in a metal cage in the courtroom during the criminal proceedings against them.
CASE OF NOVIKOV v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 26023/18
The applicant complained of the unlawful detention (deprivation of liberty).
CASE OF ILYICHEV AND ZUBKOV v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 2703/18 and 23642/18
The applicants complained of the secret surveillance in the context of criminal proceedings.