The applicants complained of the secret surveillance in the context of criminal proceedings.
CASE OF MARTYNCHUK AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 69195/17 and 4 other
The applicants complained of the unlawful detention. FIFTH SECTION CASE OF MARTYNCHUK AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (Application no. 69195/17 and 4 other – see appended list) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 1 December 2022
CASE OF JURIČIĆ v. CROATIA (European Court of Human Rights) 646/17
The application concerns civil proceedings between a State-founded agency and the applicant regarding a real-estate purchase contract.
CASE OF GATAGAZHEV AND LUGACHEV v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 43813/16
The applicants complained of the inadequate conditions of detention under strict imprisonment regime.
CASE OF MONAKHOV AND SELIVERSTOV v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 19560/16 and 33300/16
The applicants complained of the inhuman or degrading treatment and the authorities’ failure to investigate the matter.
CASE OF PĂDURARIU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA (European Court of Human Rights) 37813/15
FOURTH SECTION CASE OF PĂDURARIU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA (Application no. 37813/15) JUDGMENT (Revision) STRASBOURG 1 December 2022
CASE OF SYDORENKO AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 26269/13 and 4 others
The applicants complained of the unlawful detention. In applications nos. 26269/13, 53656/13, 1470/18 and 27194/18, the applicants also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
CASE OF NIKONOROV v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 71889/11
The applicant complained of inhuman and degrading treatment, the authorities’ failure to investigate it properly and the lack of effective domestic remedies against the violation alleged.
CASE OF PONOMAREV v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 33245/11
The applicant complained of the various restrictions imposed by the authorities on the location, time or manner of conduct of a public event.
CASE OF SAVELOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 62815/10 and 5 others
The applicants complained of the disproportionate measures taken against them on account of their arrest and conviction for an administrative offence following their participation in public demonstrations.