The applicants complained of the unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses.
CASE OF GULAMOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 27425/19 and 10 others
The applicants complained of the deficiencies in proceedings for review of the lawfulness of detention under Article 5 § 4 of the Convention.
CASE OF ABINYAKIN v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 4695/19
The applicant complained of the unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses.
CASE OF FOROSTYAN v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 58501/18
The applicant complained of the unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine a witness.
CASE OF KOZHUKHOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 54994/18 and 3 others
The applicants complained of the deficiencies in proceedings for review of the lawfulness of detention. Some applicants also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
CASE OF TUPIKIN v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 54390/18
The applicant complained of the excessive length of criminal proceedings against him.
CASE OF KONDRASHEV v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 45497/18
The applicant complained of the unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses.
CASE OF POPOV v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 20298/18
The applicant complained of the secret surveillance in the context of criminal proceedings.
CASE OF MIKHEYEV v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 13175/18
The applicant complained of the unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine the key prosecution witness.
CASE OF BIKBULATOV AND NEVOLIN v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 9205/18 and 31367/20
The applicants complained of the deficiencies in proceedings for review of the lawfulness of detention. In application no. 31367/20, the applicant also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.