The applicants alleged that they had been ill-treated by the police and that the investigation into their respective complaints had been ineffective. In addition, one applicant (application no. 57854/13) also raised other complaints under Article
The present case concerns the applicant’s complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention that the appellate court had acted arbitrarily when it accepted the respondent’s
The case concerns the alleged unfairness, within the meaning of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, of the criminal proceedings conducted against the applicant, on account of the manner in which the principal evidence was obtained and used against…
The case concerns the requisition of the applicants’ property and the disproportionality of the rent received by the applicants under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1, as well as the effectiveness of the Constitutional Court as a remedy for the…
The cases concern the applicants’ life imprisonment without the possibility of release on parole. The applicants complained that their sentences constituted inhuman and degrading punishment, in breach of Article 3 of the Convention.
The applicant alleged, in particular, that the Austrian authorities had failed to protect her and her children from her violent husband, and that this had resulted in him murdering their son.
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 252 June 2021 Melike v. Turkey – 35786/19 Judgment 15.6.2021 [Section II]
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 252 June 2021 Vardan Martirosyan v. Armenia – 13610/12 Judgment 15.6.2021 [Section IV]
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 252 June 2021 Y.S. and O.S. v. Russia – 17665/17 Judgment 15.6.2021 [Section III]
The application concerns the alleged unfairness of criminal proceedings against the applicant on account of the systemic denial of his right to a lawyer during his time in police custody on the basis of Law no. 3842,