Information Note on the Court’s case-law 264 July 2022 Association of Civil Servants and Union for Collective Bargaining v. Germany – 815/18, 3278/18, 12380/18 et al. Judgment 5.7.2022 [Section III]
Loizides v. Cyprus (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 264 July 2022 Loizides v. Cyprus – 31029/15 Judgment 5.7.2022 [Section III]
Drousiotis v. Cyprus (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 264 July 2022 Drousiotis v. Cyprus – 42315/15 Judgment 5.7.2022 [Section III]
CASE OF IVANOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 50942/08 and 5 others
The applications concern, among other things, complaints under Articles 3 and 13 of the Convention about alleged ill-treatment of the applicants at the hands of State officials and the lack of a proper investigation in that regard.
CASE OF KURSISH AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 62003/08 and 5 others
The applicants alleged that between 2007 and 2016 they had been ill‑treated by State officials and that there had been no effective investigation into the matter.
CASE OF STĂNESCU v. ROMANIA (European Court of Human Rights) 3861/16
The application concerns the applicant’s complaint that her property was seized for an excessive amount of time, constituting a breach of her right to the peaceful enjoyment of her possessions,
CASE OF AGROKUALITA EOOD v. ROMANIA (European Court of Human Rights) 18669/19
The application concerns the applicant company’s complaint that because of a wrongful interpretation of the domestic law regulating insolvency proceedings, namely Law no. 85/2014, and in particular Article 42 § 3 of that Law,
CASE OF VLAD v. ROMANIA (European Court of Human Rights) 1020/20
The application concerns the non-enforcement of court decisions setting the contact schedule between the applicant and his child.
CASE OF LILIAN ERHAN v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA (European Court of Human Rights) 21947/16
The case concerns the alleged unfairness of criminal proceedings in which the applicant was found guilty of drink-driving and in which he was not afforded adequate facilities for the preparation of his defence.
CASE OF LOIZIDES v. CYPRUS (European Court of Human Rights) 31029/15
The case concerns the fairness of criminal appeal proceedings, owing to the alleged failure of the Supreme Court to render a reasoned judgment which was sufficiently clear as to its outcome, in view of that court’s tied vote.