Information Note on the Court’s case-law 250 April 2021 Tőkés v. Romania – 15976/16 and 50461/17 Judgment 27.4.2021 [Section IV]
CASE OF BARABOI AND GABURA v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 75787/17
The present case concerns the applicants’ remand in custody pending trial and house arrest for an offence which was not clearly defined under domestic criminal law.
CASE OF FABRICA DE ZAHĂR DIN GHINDEŞTI S.A. v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 54813/08
SECOND SECTION CASE OF FABRICA DE ZAHĂR DIN GHINDEŞTI S.A. v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA (Application no. 54813/08) JUDGMENT (Just satisfaction) STRASBOURG 27 April 2021
CASE OF ALIMPIEV v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 48802/08
The present case concerns the applicant’s alleged detention in inhuman conditions, failure to observe his rights during detention pending trial and censorship of his correspondence in prison.
CASE OF DOGU v. TURKEY (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 16312/10
The case mainly concerns the applicant’s inability to access the civil courts in order to request additional compensation for the pecuniary damages he suffered as a result of an explosion.
CASE OF YARGI v. TURKEY (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 22684/10
The case mainly concerns the applicant’s inability to access the civil courts in order to request additional compensation for the pecuniary damages he suffered as a result of an explosion.
CASE OF YILDIZ v. TURKEY (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 47124/10
The case concerns alleged contradictory decisions delivered by the administrative courts in identical cases and the applicant’s complaint that the domestic courts failed to provide sufficient reasoning in their decisions.
CASE OF MÎRCA v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 7845/06
The present case concerns the alleged unlawful detention of the applicants, the prohibition to contact their relatives and the ill-treatment suffered by the first applicant while in detention.
CASE OF AVCI v. TURKEY (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 18377/11
The case mainly concerns the conviction of the applicant for referring to the imprisoned leader of a terrorist organisation, namely the PKK (the Workers’ Party of Kurdistan),
JUSZCZYSZYN v. POLAND (European Court of Human Rights)
Published on 10 May 2021 FIRST SECTION Application no. 35599/20 Paweł JUSZCZYSZYN against Poland lodged on 4 August 2020 communicated on 30 April 2021 STATEMENT OF FACTS