The applicant complained that his expulsion would breach his right to respect for his private and family life as provided for by Article 8 of the Convention, and that the final domestic decision
CASE OF VASYLKOV v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 77801/13
The application concerns an issue of fair trial raised under Article 6 of the Convention in relation to administrative-offence proceedings against the applicant,
CASE OF GENERALNYY BUDIVELNYY MENEDZHMENT v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 11925/09
The applicant company complained under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention that the national courts had overturned two final decisions given in its favour after the expiry of the time-limit
CASE OF GEMU v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 16025/06
The case concerns the applicant’s allegations that the criminal proceedings against him were unfair (Article 6 of the Convention), that the medical treatment he received while in detention
CASE OF IGOR LUTSENKO v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 6251/14
The case mainly concerns: the alleged violation of the applicant’s rights under Article 11, as well as Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (d) of the Convention, in respect of the administrative offence proceedings against
CASE OF IVASHKIV v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights)
The application concerns an issue of domestic violence raised under Articles 3 and 13 of the Convention, as well as under Article 14 of the Convention and Protocol No. 12 to the Convention,
CASE OF TRYETYAK v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 10919/20
The case mainly concerns the alleged hindrance of the applicant’s contact and communication with his son, born in March 2013, by his former spouse (the child’s mother),
CASE OF PONOMARENKO v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 17030/20
The application concerns the alleged lengthy proceedings before the domestic courts further to the applicant’s request of February 2017 mainly seeking an order that her three children
CASE OF CHAKVETADZE v. GEORGIA (European Court of Human Rights) 55949/10
The present application principally concerns the applicant’s complaint under Article 6 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 in respect of the delay in the enforcement of a judgment in his favour.
CASE OF MELIKSETYAN v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 40057/11
The present case concerns allegations, under Articles 3 and 13 of the Convention, that the applicant was tortured by the police, his complaint was not properly investigated and no effective remedies were available in respect of that complaint.