THIRD SECTION CASE OF ZAO INFORMATSIONNOYE AGENTSTVO ROSBALT v. RUSSIA (Application no. 16503/14) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 24 May 2022
CASE OF PREOBRAZHENIYE ROSSII AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 78607/11
The case concerns the dissolution of the applicant organisation, a public association registered in 2001 in the Kemerovo region and eventually becoming “the all-Russia charitable public organisation ‘Preobrazheniye Rossii’”
CASE OF STROGOV AND KIRICHENKO v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 43387/09
On 10 December 2008 the Kuntsevskiy District Court of Moscow (“the District Court”) convicted the applicants to nine years and six months and to nine years, respectively, for drug-related crimes.
CASE OF SİNAN ÇETİNKAYA AND AĞYAR ÇETİNKAYA v. TURKEY (European Court of Human Rights) 74536/10 and 75462/10
The application concerns the alleged breach of Article 7 of the Convention owing to the domestic courts’ failure to apply more lenient criminal-law provisions in respect of the applicants,
CASE OF DOKUKINY v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 1223/12
The application concerns the applicants’ alleged ill-treatment by the police and the authorities’ alleged failure to carry out an effective investigation into their complaints.
T.C. v. Italy (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 262 May 2022 T.C. v. Italy – 54032/18 Judgment 19.5.2022 [Section I]
CASE OF H.P. AND OTHERS v. CROATIA – 58282/19. The case concerns a custody dispute and alleged abuse of the second and third applicants by their mother
The case concerns a custody dispute and alleged abuse of the second and third applicants by their mother, K.P. Following the first applicant’s divorce from K.P. in 2014, the couple’s children,
CASE OF ŽIC v. CROATIA (European Court of Human Rights) 54115/15, 193/16 and 398/16
The case concerns the applicant’s inability to have an enforcement title against a local authority executed and to obtain salary arrears.
CASE OF ROENGKASETTAKORN ERIKSSON v. SWEDEN (European Court of Human Rights) 21574/16
The case concerns a complaint lodged under Article 8 of the Convention in relation to child-welfare measures adopted in respect of X, the applicant’s youngest child.
CASE OF BEŽANIĆ AND BAŠKARAD v. CROATIA (European Court of Human Rights) 16140/15 and 13322/16
The present case concerns the applicants’ complaint that the domestic authorities’ decisions ordering them to pay real estate transfer tax had been in breach of their right to the peaceful enjoyment of their possessions,