The case concerns a unilaterally imposed lease under Act XXIII of 1979 amending Chapter 158 of the Laws of Malta (hereinafter “the Ordinance”) affecting the applicants’ property no. 19,
CASE OF GRIMA v. MALTA (European Court of Human Rights) 38660/20
The case concerns an imposed lease as a result of the application of Chapter 69 of the Laws of Malta whereby the applicants who co-own the property no. 20, Church Street, Żebbug,
CASE OF LEONIDOV v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 2064/12
The application concerns the applicant’s complaints under Articles 6 § 1 and 13 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 that he was denied access to a cassation court in respect
CASE OF ZHURA v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 66191/10
This application concerns, in the main, the allegedly unjustified interference with the applicant’s property rights under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 and her related rights under Article 8
CASE OF SHEVCHUK v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 30854/09
The application concerns, in the main, the applicant’s complaints under Article 6 § 1 and Article 8 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 about the conduct and outcome
McCann and Healy v. Portugal (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 266 September 2022 McCann and Healy v. Portugal – 57195/17 Judgment 20.9.2022 [Section IV] Article 8 Positive obligations Article 8-1 Respect for private life
Y.P. v. Russia (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 266 September 2022 Y.P. v. Russia – 43399/13 Judgment 20.9.2022 [Section III] Article 8 Article 8-1 Respect for private life
CASE OF AVRAAMOVA v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 2718/12
The present case concerns the applicant’s complaints under Article 3 of the Convention relating to the conditions of her detention, the alleged inadequacy of her medical treatment
CASE OF ORISHCHENKO AND REGION-36 v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 50690/11
Mr Orishchenko is the owner of the website domain and a CEO of Region-36, a PR-company providing informational consulting services and publishing information on the website
CASE OF NADTOCHIY v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 32899/13
The case concerns allegedly unlawful and disproportionate deprivation of the applicant’s property, contrary to Article 1 of Protocol No. 1.