The case concerns the allegedly unlawful pre-trial detention of the applicant under Article 5 § 1 of the Convention and the alleged absence of relevant guarantees afforded to her under Article
CASE OF KORNATSKYY v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 19854/13
The case concerns the alleged breach of the applicant’s passive electoral right under Article 3 of Protocol No. 1.
CASE OF ZHVAVYY v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 6781/13
The case concerns defamation proceedings initiated against the applicant for the statements he had made in his complaints to the law-enforcement authorities and before the courts.
CASE OF KOLESNIKOV v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 988/13
The case concerns the alleged arbitrariness of and lack of justification for the applicant’s pre-trial detention and the alleged absence of a meaningful review of the lawfulness of his detention,
CASE OF ROMANYUK v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 77909/12
The case concerns the alleged breach of the applicant’s passive electoral right under Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 in two aspects: the invalidation of the 28 October 2012
CASE OF ZAVALIY AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 23342/14 and 3 others
The applicants alleged that the opening of appeal proceedings and the quashing of a judgment in their favour breached the principle of legal certainty under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention.
CASE OF KADUSHKEVYCH v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 21702/14
The case concerns the lawfulness of the applicant’s arrest and the justification of his further detention as well as the observance of the procedural guarantees during the court hearing
CASE OF MOLCHANOV v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 13911/14
The case concerns the applicant’s complaints under Article 5 §§ 1, 3 and 5 of the Convention that his detention was arbitrary and unjustified, and that he did not have an effective
CASE OF GRYNENKO v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 65890/13
The case concerns an alleged breach of Article 6 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 on account of the domestic courts’ disregard of the final judgment recognising the applicant’s title
CASE OF BABICH v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 54014/13
The case concerns the alleged arbitrariness of a court order of 10 July 2013 to remand the applicant in custody, in breach of Article 5 § 1 of the Convention, and the unavailability