The case concerns the applicant’s complaints under Article 5 §§ 1, 3 and 5 of the Convention that his detention was arbitrary and unjustified, and that he did not have an effective and enforceable right to compensation for his detention.…
CASE OF GRYNENKO v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 65890/13
The case concerns an alleged breach of Article 6 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 on account of the domestic courts’ disregard of the final judgment recognising the applicant’s title to a flat and conferring the…
CASE OF BABICH v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 54014/13
The case concerns the alleged arbitrariness of a court order of 10 July 2013 to remand the applicant in custody, in breach of Article 5 § 1 of the Convention, and the unavailability of an effective procedure whereby he could obtain a…
CASE OF TEPLITSKAYA AND BOGACH v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 23506/15 and 38211/16
The applicants complained under Article 5 of the Convention that their arrest, transfer to the police station and subsequent detention there for several hours had been unlawful. They further complained under Article 11, taken alone and in conjunction with Article…
CASE OF SERDYUKOV v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 11623/13
The case concerns the alleged unrecorded detention of the applicant and the alleged unlawfulness of his subsequent formal arrest and detention by the police, in breach of Article 5 § 1 of the Convention. FIFTH SECTION CASE OF SERDYUKOV v. UKRAINE (Application no.…
CASE OF SOLEYKO v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 78181/12
The case concerns the alleged breach of the applicant’s passive electoral right under Article 3 of Protocol No. 1. FIFTH SECTION CASE OF SOLEYKO v. UKRAINE (Application no. 78181/12) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 20 September 2022 This judgment is final but it…
CASE OF POPADIĆ v. SERBIA (European Court of Human Rights) 7833/12
The present case concerns the allegedly protracted length of matrimonial proceedings which prevented the applicant from fully exercising his parental responsibility over his son to include overnight and holiday contact, without relevant and sufficient reasons being adduced for limiting his…
CASE OF Y.P. v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 43399/13
The case concerns the applicant’s sterilisation in a public hospital without her informed consent. THIRD SECTION CASE OF Y.P. v. RUSSIA (Application no. 43399/13) JUDGMENT Art 3 ● Inhuman and degrading treatment ● Sterilisation without consent not reaching requisite threshold…
CASE OF PERKOV v. CROATIA (European Court of Human Rights) 33754/16
The case concerns the applicant’s complaints under Article 3 of the Convention that he was beaten by prison guards and that no effective investigation was carried out in that respect. FIRST SECTION CASE OF PERKOV v. CROATIA (Application no. 33754/16)…
Stanislav Lutsenko v. Ukraine (no. 2) (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 266 September 2022 Stanislav Lutsenko v. Ukraine (no. 2) – 483/10 Judgment 15.9.2022 [Section V] Article 8 Article 8-1 Respect for private life No legal basis for disciplinary sanctions leading to imposition of stricter…