The applicants complained under Article 5 of the Convention that their arrest, transfer to the police station and subsequent detention there for several hours had been unlawful. They further complained under Article 11, taken alone and in conjunction with Article…
CASE OF SERDYUKOV v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 11623/13
The case concerns the alleged unrecorded detention of the applicant and the alleged unlawfulness of his subsequent formal arrest and detention by the police, in breach of Article 5 § 1 of the Convention.
CASE OF SOLEYKO v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 78181/12
The case concerns the alleged breach of the applicant’s passive electoral right under Article 3 of Protocol No. 1.
CASE OF POPADIĆ v. SERBIA (European Court of Human Rights) 7833/12
The present case concerns the allegedly protracted length of matrimonial proceedings which prevented the applicant from fully exercising his parental responsibility over his son to include overnight
CASE OF Y.P. v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 43399/13
The case concerns the applicant’s sterilisation in a public hospital without her informed consent.
CASE OF PERKOV v. CROATIA (European Court of Human Rights) 33754/16
The case concerns the applicant’s complaints under Article 3 of the Convention that he was beaten by prison guards and that no effective investigation was carried out in that respect.
Stanislav Lutsenko v. Ukraine (no. 2) (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 266 September 2022 Stanislav Lutsenko v. Ukraine (no. 2) – 483/10 Judgment 15.9.2022 [Section V] Article 8 Article 8-1 Respect for private life
Rabczewska v. Poland (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 266 September 2022 Rabczewska v. Poland – 8257/13 Judgment 15.9.2022 [Section I] Article 10 Article 10-1 Freedom of expression
CASE OF VORONIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 51245/20 and 2 others
The applicants complained of the deficiencies in proceedings for review of the lawfulness of detention.
CASE OF TIMOKHIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 6510/21 and 2 others
The applicants complained of the deficiencies in proceedings for review of the lawfulness of detention. They also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.