The present case concerns the two-year exclusion of the applicant, a long-term migrant in Russia, for three administrative offences of exceeding speed limit and the authorities’ failure to duly assess the proportionality
CASE OF NEDELCHEV v. BULGARIA (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 30543/13
The case concerns a complaint under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention that, in judicial proceedings concerning the applicant’s dismissal on disciplinary grounds, the Supreme Administrative Court failed to respond to a key argument put forward by him.
CASE OF TSUROYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) Applications nos. 8372/07 and 2 others – see appended list
The applicants were arrested and subsequently convicted of having participated in a massive armed attack in Nazran, Ingushetia, in June 2004. They alleged, among other things, that they had been ill-treated by State
CASE OF MIHU AND OPREA v. ROMANIA (European Court of Human Rights) Applications nos. 54983/16 and 59295/16
The case concerns the applicants’ allegations, made under Article 5 § 1 of the Convention, that they were unlawfully deprived of their liberty from 8.30 a.m. on 6 April 2016 to 3 a.m. on 7 April 2016 (Ms Mihu – “the first applicant”)
CASE OF DIJKHUIZEN v. THE NETHERLANDS (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 61591/16
The case concerns the applicant’s complaint under Article 6 of the Convention that he was prevented from attending the appeal hearing in his criminal case, whether in person or by videoconference, and thereby from exercising the rights of the defence.
CASE OF ANCIENT BALTIC RELIGIOUS ASSOCIATION “ROMUVA” v. LITHUANIA (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 48329/19
The case concerns the refusal by the Seimas (the Lithuanian Parliament) to grant to the applicant association the status of a State‑recognised religious association (valstybės pripažinta religinė bendrija).
Norwegian Confederation of Trade Unions (LO) and Norwegian Transport Workers’ Union (NTF) v. Norway (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 252 June 2021 Norwegian Confederation of Trade Unions (LO) and Norwegian Transport Workers’ Union (NTF) v. Norway – 45487/17 Judgment 10.6.2021 [Section V]
CASE OF GEN AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) Applications nos. 41596/19 and 42767/19
The case concerns the non-enforcement of child contact arrangements established by the court, allegedly in breach of Article 8 of the Convention.
CASE OF KRALJEVIC GUDELJ v. CROATIA (European Court of Human Rights) Application nos. 42411/16 and 2 others
The case concerns the applicants’ complaints, under Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (c) of the Convention, that in the criminal proceedings against them they had not been given an opportunity to attend the sessions of the appeal panel (the…
CASE OF BLIZNYUK v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 20789/14
The case concerns the applicant’s complaints under Article 2 of the Convention about the death of her son in suspicious circumstances allegedly involving State agents and about ineffective investigation into those events.